Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Log-diversity and abundance of dead wood dependent bracket fungi and bryophytes, a comparison between spruce woodland key habitats and adjacent production forests in Östergötland, Sweden.
Linköping University, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology.
2019 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Dead wood in forests are essential habitat for a wide range of fungal, insects, lichens and bryophyte species. The main threat to dead wood dependent species is lack of substrate, which aggravates their ability to reach and colonize a new substrate. Inventories of woodland key habitats (WKHs) is a method to map forests with high biological value in Sweden, and these areas may benefit dead wood dependent species. The aim of this study was to compare spruce dominated WKHs with adjacent production spruce forests (APFs), regarding (1) log diversity, (2) log characteristics and (3) abundance of selected species on logs. The study was conducted in Östergötland County in Sweden, seven spruce WKHs (≥ 60% spruce) and seven APFs of three different types (two clear-cuts, two dominated by trees < 20 cm and three dominated by trees > 20 cm) were investigated. Data of eight wood dependent species (three bryophytes and five bracket fungi), log diversity, six log characteristics and two environmental factors were collected. In a total area of 4.27 ha, 210 logs (105 logs in WKH and APF each) were studied and the results show that there were significantly higher amount of coarse logs, distribution area of species, number of logs/ha, diameter, decay class and humidity inside WKHs compared with APFs. The total distribution area of species was approximately 85% larger in WKHs. Bark cover was slightly less in WKHs and sun exposure was significantly higher and humidity was lower in clear-cuts. According to the current study, WKHs are important for conservation of wood depending species due to the higher amount and diversity of coarse dead wood. Furthermore, it is necessary to put aside larger amount of coarse dead wood inside production forests, together with changed logging techniques to increase the suitable substrate for dead wood dependent species.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. , p. 22
Keywords [en]
Bracket fungi, Bryophytes, Dead wood, Dispersal, Diversity, Production forest, Woodland key habitat.
National Category
Natural Sciences Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-159682ISRN: LITH-IFM-G-EX--19/3739--SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-159682DiVA, id: diva2:1343541
Subject / course
Biology
Presentation
2019-05-28, Linköping, 14:35 (English)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2019-08-19 Created: 2019-08-17 Last updated: 2019-08-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(14467 kB)647 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 14467 kBChecksum SHA-512
8c4a30d8e064a2731403941c3997efbb4feb386edf0750aae2e71598302a43ea6459bec1c436db6af8e624af0cc8d88e1204892e62950ff17166b67807757101
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology
Natural SciencesEcology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 647 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 298 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf