Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Defining High Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Consensus Document From the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk
La Tour Hosp, Geneva, Switzerland;Cardiovasc European Res Ctr, Massy, France.
Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, New York, NY 10029 USA.
Tech Univ Munich, Deutsch Herzzentrum Munchen, Munich, Germany.
Univ Florida, Coll Med, Div Cardiol, Jacksonville, FL USA.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Circulation, ISSN 0009-7322, E-ISSN 1524-4539, Vol. 140, no 3, p. 240-261Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Identification and management of patients at high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention are of major importance, but a lack of standardization in defining this population limits trial design, data interpretation, and clinical decision-making. The Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ARC-HBR) is a collaboration among leading research organizations, regulatory authorities, and physician-scientists from the United States, Asia, and Europe focusing on percutaneous coronary intervention-related bleeding. Two meetings of the 31-member consortium were held in Washington, DC, in April 2018 and in Paris, France, in October 2018. These meetings were organized by the Cardiovascular European Research Center on behalf of the ARC-HBR group and included representatives of the US Food and Drug Administration and the Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, as well as observers from the pharmaceutical and medical device industries. A consensus definition of patients at high bleeding risk was developed that was based on review of the available evidence. The definition is intended to provide consistency in defining this population for clinical trials and to complement clinical decision-making and regulatory review. The proposed ARC-HBR consensus document represents the first pragmatic approach to a consistent definition of high bleeding risk in clinical trials evaluating the safety and effectiveness of devices and drug regimens for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS , 2019. Vol. 140, no 3, p. 240-261
Keywords [en]
clinical trial protocols as topic, hemorrhage, percutaneous coronary intervention
National Category
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-390777DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040167ISI: 000475497000016PubMedID: 31116032OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-390777DiVA, id: diva2:1343488
Funder
AstraZenecaAvailable from: 2019-08-16 Created: 2019-08-16 Last updated: 2019-08-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(373 kB)55 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 373 kBChecksum SHA-512
c5b118e7b4d759da9422a8d124c51968eff6aecfbc3e7358b3d21b060048a2654254671af5c20223f749e6c0a4948cb26029ea942d7d514912d3c1106a719f03
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
James, Stefan
By organisation
CardiologyUCR-Uppsala Clinical Research Center
In the same journal
Circulation
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 55 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 53 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf