Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Wholly Artificial Arrangements Under ATAD and EU Case Law.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
2019 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Since the coming into force of the EU Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD), there has been a lot of questions as to the meaning of the concept of wholly artificial arrangements and how member states can enact legislation to combat abuse of rights and other fraudulent practices within the European Union. However, the concept of wholly artificial arrangements as enacted in articles 6 & 7 of the ATAD is not new. It’s a concept that has been well developed within the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and hence, the judgments and opinions of the Court of Justice of the European Union are very important in understanding articles 6 & 7 of ATAD. As demonstrated in this thesis, despite the fact that member states are free to enact measures aimed at combatting abusive practices when it comes to tax matters, however they must do so in a such a way as not to go against EU law or EU basic freedoms. Hence EU law remains supreme. Furthermore, the fact that a taxpayer decides to take advantage of favourable tax rates abroad does not presume an intention to fraud and all cases of abuse of rights must be dealt with on a case-by-case basis. As shall be shown in this thesis, the only instance where the Court of Justice of the European Union will accept restrictive measures in order to combat tax avoidance and tax evasion, is only when it involves the use of wholly artificial arrangements in order to circumvent both EU law and national law. And this must be based on both an objective and a subjective test as shall be seen in the thesis. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019.
National Category
Law
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-389766OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-389766DiVA, id: diva2:1338792
Educational program
Master Programme in International Tax Law and EU Tax Law
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2019-12-19 Created: 2019-07-24 Last updated: 2019-12-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(307 kB)17 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 307 kBChecksum SHA-512
f706c3ee38545c7ca75668fb9fb70025ac784d2ee7ffb89b8b499611adc43a018d772676d4a0dc7997b4f273c32dc5511dc656f62f61cbec6c8bd68db9890d9b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Law
Law

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 17 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 11 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf