Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A prospective randomized assessment of quality of life between open and robotic hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Children's and Women's health. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences.
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Children's and Women's health. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Center of Paediatrics and Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics in Linköping.
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Drug Research. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Anaesthetics, Operations and Specialty Surgery Center, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care in Linköping (ANOPIVA).
Linköping University, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Children's and Women's health. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. Region Östergötland, Center of Paediatrics and Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics in Linköping.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5702-4116
2019 (English)In: International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, ISSN 1048-891X, E-ISSN 1525-1438, Vol. 29, no 4, p. 721-727Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective There are limited prospective data on the evaluation of quality of life in patients undergoing robotic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Our objective was to determine whether post-operative recovery differs between robotic and abdominal hysterectomy.

Methods At a Swedish tertiary referral university hospital, 50 women with low-risk endometrial cancer scheduled for surgery between February 2012 and May 2016 were included in a randomized trial. Surgery was performed according to principles for minimal invasive surgery. Anesthesia and peri-operative care followed a standardized enhanced recovery after surgery program in both groups. The EuroQol Group form EQ-5D and the Short Form-36 were used to evaluate patients' health-related quality of life. The Swedish Postoperative Symptoms Questionnaire assessed symptoms pre-operatively, daily for 7 days from the day of surgery, and then weekly until 6 weeks post-operatively. Data were analyzed by means of non-parametric tests and repeated measures ANOVA. To evaluate the time-dependent occurrence of complications, Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional-hazard models were used.

Results A total of 50 women were enrolled in the study (25 robotic and 25 abdominal hysterectomy). Median age (68 years vs 67 years), estimated blood loss (50 mL vs 50 mL), length of hospital stay de facto (53 hours vs 51 hours), and time to meet discharge criteria (36 hours vs 36 hours) in the robotic and abdominal groups, respectively, did not differ significantly (p>0.05) Women in the robotic hysterectomy group recovered significantly faster (p=0.01) in the EQ-5D health index, and reached their pre-operative level after approximately 3 weeks, nearly 2 weeks earlier than the abdominal group. Differences regarding improvement in health-related quality of life (Short Form-36) were statistically significant in general health and social functioning only, and were in favor of robotic hysterectomy. Consumption of analgesics, pain intensity, and symptom sum score post-operatively were equal. Occurrence of complications was an independent risk factor and influenced significantly the EQ-5D health index, length of hospital stay, pain intensity, opioid consumption, and symptom sum score adversely.

Conclusion Robotic hysterectomy in the setting of an enhanced recovery after surgery program led to faster recovery in health-related quality of life compared with abdominal hysterectomy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2019. Vol. 29, no 4, p. 721-727
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-158346DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000285ISI: 000469455500010PubMedID: 30923082Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85068140980OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-158346DiVA, id: diva2:1333850
Note

Funding Agencies|Medical Research Council of South East Sweden; County Council of Ostergotland; Linkoping University; manufacturer of the robotic equipment Intuitive Surgery

Available from: 2019-07-02 Created: 2019-07-02 Last updated: 2019-12-10Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. On Quality Improvement in Gynaecological Cancer Surgery
Open this publication in new window or tab >>On Quality Improvement in Gynaecological Cancer Surgery
2019 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Objectives: The overall purpose of this thesis was to find medical and surgical treatment methods of improving the perioperative care of gynaecological cancer patients. The specific objectives were to determine whether a single dose tranexamic acid given immediately before surgery for presumed advanced ovarian cancer reduces perioperative blood loss and the need for blood transfusions, and to determine whether postoperative recovery, tissue damage, and inflammatory response markers differ between women operated with robotic and abdominal hysterectomy for low-risk endometrial cancer in an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme, and to evaluate costs for hospital stay and postoperative recovery in relation to health impact.

Material and Methods: The thesis was based on two randomised trials. The first trial was a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre study conducted in four hospitals in the southeast and central of Sweden between March 2008 and May 2012. One hundred women with presumed advanced ovarian cancer who had been scheduled for radical debulking surgery were included; 50 received tranexamic acid and 50 received a placebo. The main outcomes were blood loss and red blood cell transfusions. The second trial was a randomised open single centre trial at a Swedish university hospital, which included 50 women with low-risk endometrial cancer scheduled for radical surgery between February 2012 and May 2016; 25 women underwent robotic hysterectomy and 25 had abdominal hysterectomy. Anaesthesia and perioperative care followed an ERAS protocol in both groups. The EuroQol Group form EQ-5D-3L and the Short Form-36 evaluated the health-related quality of life. The Swedish Postoperative Symptoms Questionnaire assessed symptoms perioperatively until six weeks postoperatively. Venous blood samples were collected on several occasions until six weeks postoperatively and were analysed for markers reflecting inflammatory response and tissue damage. In addition, a health economic evaluation was conducted comparing total costs, qualityadjusted life years (QALYs) and cost per QALY between the surgical methods.

Results: Total blood loss volume and transfusion rate following surgery in advanced ovarian cancer were significantly lower in the tranexamic group compared with the placebo group. Women with early endometrial cancer treated by robotic hysterectomy recovered significantly faster in the EQ-5D health index, and reached their preoperative level nearly two weeks earlier than the abdominal group. Differences regarding improvement in health-related quality of life (Short Form-36) comprising general health and social functioning were more favourable in the robotic hysterectomy group. Consumption of analgesics, pain intensity, postoperative symptom sum score and length of hospital stay were equal between the groups. The occurrence of complications was an independent risk factor and influenced most of the outcome measures adversely. Postoperative inflammatory response and tissue damage were lower after robotic hysterectomy compared with the abdominal approach. The robotic group gained more QALYs until six weeks after surgery than the abdominal group but the total costs were higher. The total cost per QALY gained was quite high for the robotic procedure.

Conclusions: A single dose of tranexamic acid given immediately before surgery reduces blood loss and transfusion rates in advanced ovarian cancer surgery. Robotic hysterectomy in an ERAS programme treating early endometrial cancer leads to a faster recovery in the health-related quality of life than abdominal hysterectomy, the latter being strongly influenced by perioperative complications. Less tissue damage and inflammation might contribute to a faster recovery in the robotic group. Robotic hysterectomy provides more QALYs until six weeks postoperatively but with a substantially higher total cost for the society.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press, 2019. p. 92
Series
Linköping University Medical Dissertations, ISSN 0345-0082 ; 1718
National Category
Surgery Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-162598 (URN)9789179299545 (ISBN)
Public defence
2020-02-07, Berzeliussalen, Building 463, Entrance 65, Campus US, Linköping, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2019-12-10 Created: 2019-12-10 Last updated: 2019-12-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1200 kB)11 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1200 kBChecksum SHA-512
fc515b72ff0fd5b5aba6f2bf2183f622b7c095702b089d2f102616c51f2c5ffa7a325947afdb5de13c2e96233e68a47f6716c6ec98b737364ea0ee7fc6a6bf66
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lundin, EvelynBorendal Wodlin, NinnieNilsson, LenaKjölhede, Preben
By organisation
Division of Children's and Women's healthFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics in LinköpingDivision of Drug ResearchDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care in Linköping (ANOPIVA)
In the same journal
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 11 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 57 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf