Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
What's in it for me?: A process evaluation of the implementation of a mobile phone-supported intervention after stroke in Uganda
Danderyds Univ Hosp, Dept Rehabil Med, Danderyd, Sweden.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neuroscience, Lexell: Rehabilitation Medicine. Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Div Occupat Therapy, Box 23 200, S-14183 Huddinge, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5308-4821
Uganda Allied Hlth Examinat Board, Kampala, Uganda.
Karolinska Inst, Dept Neurobiol Care Sci & Soc, Div Occupat Therapy, Box 23 200, S-14183 Huddinge, Sweden.
2019 (English)In: BMC Public Health, ISSN 1471-2458, E-ISSN 1471-2458, Vol. 19, article id 562Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background

The prevalence of stroke in Uganda is increasing. In stroke rehabilitation, information and communication technology has been shown to have potential in improving service delivery in high-income countries but there is limited knowledge of its use and impact in low-income countries.The aim of the study was to evaluate the implementation process of a mobile phone-supported family-centred rehabilitation intervention and to gain knowledge on the mechanisms of impact as well as the contextual factors that might have affected the implementation process and its outcome.

Method

This was a single-case study design using the integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework and the Medical Research Council guidance as frameworks. Quantitative process data was derived from 14 log books used by occupational therapists during the implementation. Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 implementers in different professions, 12months into the implementation, in order to obtain the primary data. Secondary data was derived from six semi-structured interviews conducted directly after pre-intervention workshops and 6 months later. The framework method was used in the data analysis.

Results

In 11 out of 14 cases, the clients were compliant with the intervention. Yet, challenges such as technical problems were reported. The target of conducting 16 phone calls for each client was achieved to 74%. Eight categories emerged from the qualitative analysis of the interviews including: 1) perceptions on facilitation, 2) using scientific and experience-based knowledge, 3) tailoring the intervention, 4) supportive working culture, 5) barriers to the service delivery, 6) implementers' interaction with the intervention, 7) perceptions on motivations and values, and 8) improving the model and enabling sustainability. Mechanisms contributing to the implementation of the intervention included engaged facilitators and motivated participants. Challenges in the client recruitment and poor information dissemination were some of the mechanisms impeding the implementation.

Conclusions

The intervention was partially delivered in accordance with the logic model for the project, where the implementation process was influenced by several barriers in the context such as technical setbacks. However, there were also several mediators in the process driving the project forward, including strong facilitation and motivated participants.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. Vol. 19, article id 562
Keywords [en]
Stroke, Africa, ICT, Low-income, Occupational therapy, Process evaluation, SMS, Tele-rehabilitation, Tele medicine
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy Occupational Therapy Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-387283DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-6849-3ISI: 000468070900002PubMedID: 31088411OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-387283DiVA, id: diva2:1329296
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2014-28-63Available from: 2019-06-24 Created: 2019-06-24 Last updated: 2019-06-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1722 kB)83 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1722 kBChecksum SHA-512
e13e0a8aa29f953dae86335b438d259d7edac8b43aed2cc165f4bc91add86ce2b90686e4d2d9ec8c19158be36f983f758b476235e0d4c12a202e8fd24c2351f5
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eriksson, Gunilla
By organisation
Lexell: Rehabilitation Medicine
In the same journal
BMC Public Health
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health EconomyOccupational TherapyPublic Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 83 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 103 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf