Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Egen regi i byggprocessen, gynnsamt eller inte?: En studie om byggprocessen inom den offentliga sektorn
Jönköping University, School of Engineering, JTH, Civil Engineeering and Lighting Science.
Jönköping University, School of Engineering, JTH, Civil Engineeering and Lighting Science.
2019 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (university diploma), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
In-house management in the building process, benficial or not? : A study about the building process in the public sector (English)
Abstract [en]

Purpose: The purpose of this report is to find out whether or not it is beneficial for a municipality to design building projects in-house in an early stage. The goal for the final thesis is to analyze pros and cons of wide in-house competence within the municipal building process, and how its perceived to impact the process and end result. The goal is answered using three main questions:

  1. What is the economical difference between a project executed in Nässjö municipality compared to a similar project in another municipality?
  2. How do key participants within the projects experience the process?
  3. How do the tenants in the projects feel about the result in regard to its area of use?

Method: The method being used for this project consists partly of a qualitative section with semi structured interviews, and partly of document analysis using economic data from two projects.

Findings: The result of the study is that it can both be beneficial and not, depending on a few factors. If these factors are met, in-house competence in the design stage can be seen as beneficial for a municipality. If few, or none, of the factors are met there is no specific reason or advantage for a municipality to have in-house competence. The factors are:

  • The size of the municipality
  • Property stock
  • Basis for projects
  • The municipality’s resources
  • Contracting form
  • How the municipality wants to develop knowledge in the staff and invest inwide or narrow competences.

Implications: For a municipality to benefit from working with in-house competence,they should follow the factors presented in the result. The conclusion is that a municipality should work in a way that works for them, and not based on what is more beneficial.

Limitations: This final thesis is limited to only two municipalities with only one project form each. The report is also limited to the design stage, and the interviews did not include contractors.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. , p. 30
Keywords [en]
Building process, public sector, in-house competence, municipality, projectleading
Keywords [sv]
Byggprocessen, offentlig sektor, egen kompetens, kommun, projektledning
National Category
Construction Management
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-44632ISRN: JU-JTH-BTA-1-20190263OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-44632DiVA, id: diva2:1326630
External cooperation
Nässjö Kommun
Subject / course
JTH, Civil Engineering
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2019-07-09 Created: 2019-06-18 Last updated: 2019-07-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(4457 kB)9 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4457 kBChecksum SHA-512
90e2cdc468046294e50fdeb295ee47437f25a75d4cfe6f54e8d2023e692965c68fd8150e62e6ea40feecaf332f5ea544a6fd1c1bc91977abf3c623bec6ba384d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
JTH, Civil Engineeering and Lighting Science
Construction Management

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 9 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 23 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf