Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Barns delaktighet vid överklagande av LVU: En systematisk genomgång av hur barn har fått komma till tals i skriftliga domslut
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Social Work and Criminology.
University of Gävle, Faculty of Health and Occupational Studies, Department of Social Work and Criminology.
2019 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [sv]

Syftet med studien var att undersöka hur stor andel barn mellan 10–14 år som tydligt fått komma till tals samt hur deras utsagor uttrycks i de skriftliga domsluten vid överklagande av LVU till kammarrätten. En kategorisering av alla domslut från utvald kammarrätt gjordes för att sedan välja ut åtta av domsluten att granska kvalitativt utifrån Harts delaktighetsstege och barndomssociologi. Resultatet visade att barn i mindre än hälften av domsluten tydligt fått komma till tals och att barnets åsikt uttrycks i olika stor utsträckning i de skriftliga domsluten, dock framkommer inte barnets åsikter i avsnittet skäl för beslut i domslutet. Barn anses ofta i förhållande till vuxna inte vara tillräckligt mogna vilket kan medför att de inte får vara aktiva aktörer och att deras handlingsutrymme begränsas. Vuxna som arbetar med barn måste vara medvetna om den komplexitet som råder mellan barnets rätt till delaktighet och barnets bästa.

Abstract [en]

The aim of this study was to examine the proportion of children between ages 10-14 who clearly got to express themselves and how their views were expressed in written documents when appealing LVU to kammarrätten. A categorization of all judgments from a court were made, the eight were selected to examine qualitatively supported by Hart's ladder of participation and childhood sociology. The result showed that children in less than half of the judgements clearly got to express themselves and that the child's words were noted to varying degrees, however, in the section reasons for decision the child’s views were not included. Children are often not considered sufficiently mature in relation to adults, which means that they may not be active actors and that their room for maneuver is restricted. Adults working with children must be aware of the complexity between the child's right to participation and the child’s best interests.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. , p. 46
Keywords [en]
children’s rights, ladder of participation, participation
Keywords [sv]
barns bästa, delaktighet, Harts delaktighetsstege
National Category
Social Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-29940OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-29940DiVA, id: diva2:1325478
Subject / course
Social work
Educational program
Social work
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2019-06-18 Created: 2019-06-16 Last updated: 2019-06-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(680 kB)8 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 680 kBChecksum SHA-512
3fd37ac81f31f733f4b31f09b77a9a597932417f238b5657d0a4f986461b2e4c0994355a9c860b163b2667f906b1ea28e2dd7cb9e676dad594913d9951f58cf1
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Social Work and Criminology
Social Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 8 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 17 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf