Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Bifacial photovoltaic systems established in a Nordic climate: A study investigating a frameless bifacial panel compared to a monofacial panel
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Science and Technology, Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences.
2019 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The aim with this project was to study the power output from a frameless bifacial photovoltaic (PV) system relative to a traditional monofacial PV system with a frame. A general overview of how the geographical conditions affects the energy utilization of different PV systems is investigated throughout the project. Also, the study examined if further comparisons and evaluations, between PV systems, can be better established.

The two examined solar parks, installed under different conditions, are located in Uppsala and Enköping, Sweden. In order to fulfill the aim and compare the different PV systems, three cases were analyzed. To increase the credibility of a comparison between the two cities, a sensitivity analysis considering the weather condition was executed.

In case one, the result indicates that a bifacial panel is 5.2% and 3.6% more advantageous than a traditional monofacial panel during summer and winter, respectively. In case two, the frameless, more tilted and elevated bifacial panel is 58% and 680% more advantageous than a traditional monofacial panel during summer and winter, respectively. Also, in case three, the frameless, more tilted and elevated bifacial panel is 19% and 76% more advantageous than a bifacial panel with frame during summer and winter, respectively.

When installing a new solar park, it is important to consider the location’s specific features since these affects the energy yield of the PV system. Future installations, which are installed with the intention to evaluate certain properties, is suggested to be installed with more initially comparable conditions in mind.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. , p. 36
Series
TVE ; 19008
Keywords [en]
Bifacial, Photovoltaic, PV, PV system, Monofacial, Frameless, Nordic, Nordic climate, Sweden, Uppsala, Enköping, Snow, Frame, solar parks, solar park, solar energy
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-384180OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-384180DiVA, id: diva2:1319252
External cooperation
Region Uppsala; STUNS
Educational program
Systems in Technology and Society Programme
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2019-06-10 Created: 2019-05-30 Last updated: 2019-06-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1442 kB)49 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1442 kBChecksum SHA-512
aaaa50efe20617a8fcdd1f7c4c463bbc23b630e6aacef736fcdec4b9904b6ff8a649c5af0feb054f30455aac5061683f22c91226dda83724a8c515c71306fcc7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Engineering Sciences
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 49 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 132 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf