Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Social Costs of Marine Litter along the East China Sea: Evidence from Ten Coastal Scenic Spots of Zhejiang Province, China
Zhejiang Univ, Sch Econ, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China; Ningbo Univ, Sch Business, Ningbo, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
Zhejiang Univ, Sch Econ, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
Ningbo Univ, Sch Business, Ningbo, Zhejiang, Peoples R China.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Economics.
2019 (English)In: Sustainability, ISSN 2071-1050, E-ISSN 2071-1050, Vol. 11, no 6, article id 1807Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Marine litter poses numerous threats to the global environment. To estimate the social costs of marine litter in China, two stated preference methods, namely the contingent valuation model (CVM) and the choice experiment model (CEM), were used in this research. This paper conducted surveys at ten different beaches along the East China Sea in Zhejiang province in October 2017. The results indicate that approximately 74.1% of the interviewees are willing to volunteer to participate in clean-up programmes and are willing to spend 1.5 days per month on average in their daily lives, which equates to a potential loss of income of USD 1.08 per day. The willingness to pay for the removal of the main types of litter ranges from USD 0.12-0.20 per visitor across the four sample cities, which is mainly determined by the degree of the removal, the crowdedness of the beach and the visitor's perception. The social costs are USD 1.08-1.40 per visitor when the contingent valuation method is applied and USD 1.00-1.07 per visitor when the choice experiment method is adopted, which accounts for 8-14% of the beach entrance fee. The analysis of the social costs of marine litter yielded some useful implications regarding future coastal management policy, including extra entrance fee, the quality-oriented environmental strategy and more incentives to volunteers.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. Vol. 11, no 6, article id 1807
Keywords [en]
social costs, marine litter, contingent valuation model, choice experiment model
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-382996DOI: 10.3390/su11061807ISI: 000464344500026OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-382996DiVA, id: diva2:1315290
Available from: 2019-05-13 Created: 2019-05-13 Last updated: 2019-05-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1317 kB)31 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1317 kBChecksum SHA-512
9e3dcebcad49a6a782e6e42c993d291351bd987cab15a14610e8d2b877159986a57fa2b308fa9d9ebe24b42f6bbb9c9599381439222815890f509bacf91dd482
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Li, Chuan-Zhong
By organisation
Department of Economics
In the same journal
Sustainability
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 31 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 29 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf