Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Subacromial decompression surgery for adults with shoulder pain: a clinical practice guideline
Lovisenberg Diaconal Hosp, Norway; Univ Oslo, Norway.
Univ Helsinki, Finland; HUS Helsinki Univ Hosp, Finland.
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. La Trobe Univ, Australia.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8102-3631
Monash Univ, Australia; Monash Univ, Australia.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: BMJ. British Medical Journal, E-ISSN 1756-1833, Vol. 364, article id l294Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Clinical question Do adults with atraumatic shoulder pain for more than 3 months diagnosed as subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS), also labelled as rotator cuff disease, benefit from subacromial decompression surgery? This guideline builds on to two recent high quality trials of shoulder surgery. Current practice SAPS is the common diagnosis for shoulder pain with several first line treatment options, including analgesia, exercises, and injections. Surgeons frequently perform arthroscopic subacromial decompression for prolonged symptoms, with guidelines providing conflicting recommendations. Recommendation The guideline panel makes a strong recommendation against surgery. How this guideline was created A guideline panel including patients, clinicians, and methodologists produced this recommendation in adherence with standards for trustworthy guidelines and the GRADE system. The recommendation is based on two linked systematic reviews on (a) the benefits and harms of subacromial decompression surgery and (b) the minimally important differences for patient reported outcome measures. Recommendations are made actionable for clinicians and their patients through visual overviews. These provide the relative and absolute benefits and harms of surgery in multilayered evidence summaries and decision aids available in MAGIC (www.magicapp.org) to support shared decisions and adaptation. The evidence Surgery did not provide important improvements in pain, function, or quality of life compared with placebo surgery or other options. Frozen shoulder may be more common with surgery. Understanding the recommendation The panel concluded that almost all informed patients would choose to avoid surgery because there is no benefit but there are harms and it is burdensome. Subacromial decompression surgery should not be offered to patients with SAPS. However, there is substantial uncertainty in what alternative treatment is best.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP , 2019. Vol. 364, article id l294
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-154841DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l294ISI: 000458616700006PubMedID: 30728120OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-154841DiVA, id: diva2:1294589
Available from: 2019-03-07 Created: 2019-03-07 Last updated: 2019-03-26

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(348 kB)220 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 348 kBChecksum SHA-512
1675ff6383d37b37dce61bfac58fa52cc8c76058cebc382e2afbe296b9fd2411273a5dd76799b99b2a84ce15353e92c6d04f098e8fe10e28a0a3d8d01da540f4
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ardern, Clare
By organisation
Division of PhysiotherapyFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
BMJ. British Medical Journal
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 220 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 95 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf