Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Lessons from Listening: The Aid Effectiveness Agenda: A Critical Systems Heuristics analysis of the Grand Bargain and Paris Declaration for Aid Effectiveness from the perspective of implementers and local practitioners
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Studies. (Peace and Development Work)
2018 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
Lessons from Listening: The Aid Effectiveness Agenda : A Critical Systems Heuristics analysis of the Grand Bargain and Paris Declaration for Aid Effectiveness from the perspective of implementers and local practitioners (English)
Abstract [en]

Wide debates over the last 15 years have questioned the impact of global initiatives like the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness 2005 and more recently the Grand Bargain 2017 on any real improvements to the development effectiveness agenda. Many also ask to what extent do the initiatives consider the concerns and views of practitioners as stakeholders who implement the objectives and who have valuable experience, contextual insights, specific skill-sets and innovative ideas on how to address complex problems (Sjöstedt 2013). The breadth of literature surrounding the initiatives seems to reflect this, collectively calling for improvements in four common theme areas; greater collaboration, partnership and coordination between actors; instilled mutual accountability and shared responsibility; simplified administrative requirements for implementers; and greater participation and inclusion of stakeholder voices throughout processes. Questions that ask ‘who are the actors and decision-makers?’, and ‘who ought they be?’ can highlight gaps between an ideal situation and the reality, and is characteristic of a Critical Systems Heuristics (CSH) approach to analysing sources of influence in a typical system, or in this case, global initiative. Therefore, this paper analyses the voices of aid and development practitioners who are actively working in the sector, and compares their responses to the four themes from the literature.

The research was conducted over three (3) months from May to July 2018 and interviewed nineteen (19) participants from a wide variety of development and humanitarian backgrounds and levels.

The main findings of the research are summed as follows:

  • Definitions of ‘effectiveness’ vary and depend on underlying political influences 
  • Global initiatives like the Paris Declaration and Grand Bargain have had minimal visible impact on changing systems at the implementation level
  • The role of global initiatives is however still important as forums for promoting discussion, defining boundaries and unifying debates
  • Power imbalances and hierarchies within the development sector are structurally embedded and addressing this is crucial to improving effectiveness
  • Real improvements to the effectiveness agenda require both innovative, participative and evidence-based learning, and systems to accept and address the concerns of implementers
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. , p. 78
Keywords [en]
Aid effectiveness, Critical Systems Heuristics, Grand Bargain, Paris Declaration
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-80331OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-80331DiVA, id: diva2:1287161
Subject / course
Peace and development
Educational program
Peace and Development Work, Master Programme, 60 credits
Presentation
2018-08-31, K3041, Linnaeus University, Vaxjo, 11:00 (English)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2019-02-12 Created: 2019-02-08 Last updated: 2019-02-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2820 kB)55 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2820 kBChecksum SHA-512
5bcf87fd61e73b1664ee8131c29e867ab5baa18aeb58eaab97c4a947667bf644ca3b1f649494f10c9aeb98893d3b8adcffeb56d6019a74f1a369f45b7a6024e5
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Social Studies
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 55 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 259 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf