Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sharing Responsibility or Protecting Borders?: A Qualitative Analysis of the Development of the Common European Asylum System
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Government.
2019 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Building on three theories of European integration – liberal intergovernmentalism, neofunctionalism and postfunctionalism – I offer an explanation to the process and outcomes of the development of the Common European Asylum System (CEAS) between 2008 and 2018. The process to establish the CEAS has been characterized by clashing actor preferences, which forced actors into negotiations. This thesis aims to analyze the dynamics of these negotiations surrounding the CEAS. My results show that liberal intergovernmentalism explains locked positions in interstate bargaining and highly compromised outcomes, and even non-decisions, of the CEAS. I also argue that neofunctionalism loses explanatory power when sensitive issues concerning automatic quota systems and national sovereignty are discussed, although many arguments by the involved actors in the policy process draw upon neofunctional assumptions. Postfunctionalism is argued to gain explanatory power during recent years, since identityrelated arguments and Eurosceptical and anti-immigrant ideas in European governments have increased.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. , p. 65
Keywords [en]
liberal intergovernmentalism, neofunctionalism, postfunctionalism, asylum, Common European Asylum System, CEAS, European integration, EU
National Category
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-376576OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-376576DiVA, id: diva2:1286434
Subject / course
Political Science
Educational program
Master Programme in Political Science
Supervisors
Available from: 2019-02-14 Created: 2019-02-06 Last updated: 2019-02-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(613 kB)37 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 613 kBChecksum SHA-512
55d0e30214326ba0027ba5b5f08556f8692448a17c860cd902d9614c4422e3dea9b06bb0b06420d792f9435d8e815ad828ff53810b22dfad184639f788b3039a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Government
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 37 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 313 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf