Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Kristnas tal om Gud i ljuset av feministisk kritik
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Theology, Department of Theology.
2019 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this essay is to examine how Christians can and should speak about God if they take feminist criticism seriously. This purpose concerns two problems: the first starts with the proposition that God is essentially different from humans and things and at the fact that the language that we use to describe and speak about God is a human language. God is infinite, incorporeal, and timeless, while the human language normally is used to apply to finite, corporeal, and temporal things. How – if ever – can this language apply to God? To examine this problem further, I present four different theories of religious language.

The second problem is actualized by feminists who criticize the standard within the Christian tradition to characterize God in predominantly masculine terms. Feminists have criticised religious language for being oppressive in several ways, and particularly to establish and maintain hierarchical structures in which women are subordinated men. In this essay I present and discuss feminist criticism of religious language and then distinguish four different strategies for feminists. I further examine three of these strategies, represented by Sallie McFague, Gail Ramshaw and Janet Soskice, dealing with the problem of religious language within the Christian tradition. In all three of these feminist strategies metaphors are found to be of great importance.

Finally, I promote Soskice metaphor theory combined with an apophatic theory of language. Soskice stresses the importance of anthropomorphous metaphors and offer the possibility of using both male and female images when speaking about God. This strategy positively handles the proposition of God as essentially different but makes it possible for believers to refer to God (through metaphors). This is also the preferable strategy in line with feminist criticism.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. , p. 38
Keywords [en]
religious language, feminism, metaphor, philosophy of religion, feminist philosophy of religion, Sallie McFague, Gail Ramshaw, Janet Soskice
Keywords [sv]
religiöst språk, feminism, metafor, religionsfilosofi, feministisk religionsfilosofi, Sallie McFague, Gail Ramshaw, Janet Soskice
National Category
Religious Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-375435OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-375435DiVA, id: diva2:1283744
Subject / course
Studies in Systematic Theology, Ethics and Philosophy of Religion
Educational program
Master Programme in Theology and Religious Studies
Presentation
2019-01-17, 10:15 (Swedish)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2019-02-04 Created: 2019-01-29 Last updated: 2019-02-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(548 kB)87 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 548 kBChecksum SHA-512
50110f450e3b619b08f5a3b540f966e597f9c8225ef6525c28b6974493cd4b4588157a0817da0f805f90568dae5638d62d56d22db7930eaa9d4bad0049040bd1
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Theology
Religious Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 87 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 333 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf