Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Past and Present of Discharge Capacity Modeling for Spillways: A Swedish Perspective
Vattenfall AB, Research & Development (R & D), Hydraulic Laboratory, Älvkarleby, Sweden;Division of Resources, Energy & Infrastructure, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4242-3824
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Fluid and Experimental Mechanics. Vattenfall AB, Research & Development (R & D), Hydraulic Laboratory, Älvkarleby, Sweden.
Division of Resources, Energy & Infrastructure, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7631-3503
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences and Mathematics, Fluid and Experimental Mechanics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0820-617x
2019 (English)In: Fluids, ISSN 2311-5521, Vol. 4, no 10, article id 4010010Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Most of the hydropower dams in Sweden were built before 1980. The present dam-safety guidelines have resulted in higher design floods than their spillway discharge capacity and the need for structural upgrades. This has led to renewed laboratory model tests. For some dams, even computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are performed. This provides the possibility to compare the spillway discharge data between the model tests performed a few decades apart. The paper presents the hydropower development, the needs for the ongoing dam rehabilitations and the history of physical hydraulic modeling in Sweden. More than 20 spillways, both surface and bottom types, are analyzed to evaluate their discharge modeling accuracy. The past and present model tests are compared with each other and with the CFD results if available. Discrepancies do exist in the discharges between the model tests made a few decades apart. The differences fall within the range −8.3%–+11.2%. The reasons for the discrepancies are sought from several aspects. The primary source of the errors is seemingly the model construction quality and flow measurement method. The machine milling technique and 3D printing reduce the source of construction errors and improve the model quality. Results of the CFD simulations differ, at the maximum, by 3.8% from the physical tests. They are conducted without knowledge of the physical model results in advance. Following the best practice guidelines, CFD should generate results of decent accuracy for discharge prediction.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI, 2019. Vol. 4, no 10, article id 4010010
Keywords [en]
spillway, bottom outlet, design flood, discharge capacity, model tests, computational fluid dynamics (CFD)
National Category
Water Engineering Fluid Mechanics and Acoustics
Research subject
Fluid Mechanics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-72663DOI: 10.3390/fluids4010010ISI: 000464468000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85063403125OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-72663DiVA, id: diva2:1282134
Note

Validerad;2019;Nivå 2;2019-02-28 (marisr)

Available from: 2019-01-24 Created: 2019-01-24 Last updated: 2019-04-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(43096 kB)44 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 43096 kBChecksum SHA-512
84354591681b29f5681ebc350439e85a82e78228bc1f52bf16bfd0f79050d30e2becb286e32b6425f2b69f63f59e99d27057ec46edf02c840ebb23501a673f37
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Yang, JamesAndreasson, PatrikTeng, PenghuaXie, Qiancheng
By organisation
Fluid and Experimental Mechanics
Water EngineeringFluid Mechanics and Acoustics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 44 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 108 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf