Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A comparison between database and Internet of Thing solutions: For remote measuring of radon
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Science, Technology and Media, Department of Information Systems and Technology.
2018 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (professional degree), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

More and more devices around us are connected to the internet and communicate to each other. This includes devices such as radon sensors. Radon is a radio active gas and is the cause of several hundred cases of lung cancer. Smart connected radon sensors can be helpful to reduce the levels of radon as they provide remote access to the user. This study examines the opportunity to connect an already existing radon sensor to the “Internet of Things”. The aim of this study has been to answer the problem “find a better solution for the IoT system and develop it”. The study was performed with a literature study of three Internet of Things platforms. This resulted in one Internet of Thing platform being used throughout the study. A database system and a system with the chosen platform was implemented and a time measurement of the different systems was performed. The study has shown that a less secured system is faster and it is also shown that the Amazon Web Service IoT Core is fast with respect to the many features offered. The study concludes that the choice of system depends on where and how the system is supposed to be implement. If the system just needs to send and store data, a regular MySQL database is enough. If the system in the future is supposed to be able to communicate with other devices, a IoT platform should be used.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. , p. 37
Keywords [en]
Fog-computing, fog-unit, MQTT, CoAP, Raspberry Pi, Python
National Category
Software Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-34047Local ID: DT-V18-G3-008OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-34047DiVA, id: diva2:1229714
Subject / course
Computer Engineering DT1
Educational program
Master of Science in Engineering - Computer Engineering TDTEA 300 higher education credits
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2018-07-02 Created: 2018-07-02 Last updated: 2018-07-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(979 kB)29 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 979 kBChecksum SHA-512
06b3c9af126ab9a122f9a387afbb97e86038998c5ef745c56a13054ebdfebb2e40ad15caa62c3b9c87d3ebc0eccf6f7cb48acd5fd23f7927327ac255be9a50b0
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Svensson, Wictor
By organisation
Department of Information Systems and Technology
Software Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 29 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 135 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf