Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comment on 'The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions'
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Strategic Sustainable Development.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5966-5141
Leuphana Univ, DEU.
2018 (English)In: Environmental Research Letters, ISSN 1748-9326, E-ISSN 1748-9326, Vol. 13, no 6, article id 068001Article in journal, Editorial material (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Wynes and Nicholas (2017a Environ. Res. Lett. 12 1-9) recently published an article that reviewed academic and grey literature to identify the most impactful individual actions for reducing carbon emissions in developed countries, identifying having 'one fewer child' as by far the most impactful action. This action was recommended with little context considering its controversial nature. We argue that there are three issue-areas that Wynes and Nicholas should have engaged with to improve the clarity of their recommendations and reduced the potential for misunderstanding, which are (1) the extent to which individual actions in one's private life can address climate change in relation to collective actions and actions in the professional sphere (2) the role of overconsumption in driving climate change and (3) the extent to which family planning is a human right. We also suggest that engagement with these issue-areas are a step towards a better practice in academic writing on population as an environmental issue.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IOP PUBLISHING LTD , 2018. Vol. 13, no 6, article id 068001
Keywords [en]
behaviour change, birth control, consumption, climate change, collective action, family planning, sustainability
National Category
Social Sciences Interdisciplinary Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-16635DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aac9d0ISI: 000435213600001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-16635DiVA, id: diva2:1228502
Note

open access

Available from: 2018-06-28 Created: 2018-06-28 Last updated: 2019-06-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(598 kB)11 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 598 kBChecksum SHA-512
40fc09ac1d93134b017cdb8c6d63d93d7bc116a8f1433dbe495cb25712eeb7bab86ab5b55c6d5e360ec2ff796113a60b1e6c59d1c63351cfe75b216666e0727f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Pedersen, Rebecca Laycock
By organisation
Department of Strategic Sustainable Development
In the same journal
Environmental Research Letters
Social Sciences InterdisciplinaryEnvironmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 11 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 148 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf