Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparing video consultation with inperson assessment for Swedish patients with hard-to-heal ulcers: registry-based studies of healing time and of waiting time
Lund Univ, SWE.
Blekinge Wound Healing Ctr, Karlshamn, SWE.
Blekinge Ctr Competence, Karlskrona, SWE.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Health. Blekinge Inst Technol, Dept Hlth, Karlskrona, Sweden..ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9870-8477
Show others and affiliations
2018 (English)In: BMJ Open, ISSN 2044-6055, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 8, no 2, article id e017623Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives To investigate differences in ulcer healing time and waiting time between video consultation and inperson assessment for patients with hard-to-heal ulcers. Setting Patients treated at Blekinge Wound Healing Centre, a primary care centre covering the whole of Blekinge county (150 000 inhabitants), were compared with patients registered and treated according to the Registry of Ulcer Treatment, a Swedish national web-based quality registry. Participants In the study for analysing ulcer healing time, the study group consisted of 100 patients diagnosed through video consultation between October 2014 and September 2016. The control group for analysing healing time consisted of 1888 patients diagnosed through inperson assessment during the same period. In the study for analysing waiting time, the same study group (n=100) was compared with 100 patients diagnosed through inperson assessment. Primary and secondary outcome measures Differences in ulcer healing time were analysed using the log-rank test. Differences in waiting time were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results Median healing time was 59 days (95% CI 40 to 78) in the study group and 82 days (95% CI 75 to 89) in the control group (P<0.001). Median waiting time was 25 days (range: 1-83 days) in the study group and 32 days (range: 3-294 days) for patients diagnosed through inperson assessment (P=0.017). There were no significant differences between the study group and the control group regarding age, gender or ulcer size. Conclusions Healing time and waiting time were significantly shorter for patients diagnosed through video consultation compared with those diagnosed through inperson assessment.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP , 2018. Vol. 8, no 2, article id e017623
Keywords [en]
ehealth, leg ulcer, registries, telemedicine, wound healing
National Category
Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-16637DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017623ISI: 000433129800102PubMedID: 29449288OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-16637DiVA, id: diva2:1228493
Note

open access

Available from: 2018-06-28 Created: 2018-06-28 Last updated: 2018-09-06

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(647 kB)10 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 647 kBChecksum SHA-512
8be0be7d91b63cd09c2ffcce16b221175b44805eea7b270b7eb2f21bd5e1f57bb55b9b34d364a98a82d7ef22967ece2e0bf2172f8266172f4fdd3e7d3acfb60f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Anderberg, Peter
By organisation
Department of Health
In the same journal
BMJ Open
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 10 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 60 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf