Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
"Campaigning for power, not for the people": A comparative case study about Cape Town youth and their perceptions of voting
Karlstad University, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013).
2018 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The declining political participation among youth has been frequently debated and researched in Western democracies. South Africa is often considered a role model that other African countries can learn from in terms of democracy. The purpose of this study is to investigate how young people in South Africa view voting to understand why turnout among youth is declining. This thesis is based on a field study conducted with two groups from different socioeconomic classes in Cape Town with qualitative in-depth interviews as methodological approach.

 

The thesis has found that the theories developed from previous research on Western democracies, such as political efficacy, alternative value, partisan attachment and socioeconomic status can partly help explain why youth in South Africa do not vote. However, the study has found that these theories does not provide an ideal framework to understand this phenomenon among young people in less developed democracies. Youth in South Africa faces other problems than their counterparts elsewhere. Poverty, distrust towards the politicians and lack of education makes them unable to fully engage in the political process. Other factors such as race and gender also influence the perception of voting, especially among youth in groups with lower socioeconomic status. Thus, turnout in elections can not be used as an only indicator to measure the quality of a democracy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. , p. 43
National Category
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-68121OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-68121DiVA, id: diva2:1225356
Subject / course
Political Science
Educational program
Political Science (180 ECTS credits)
Supervisors
Examiners
Note

The essay is a result of a Minor Field Study that has been financed by SIDA (Swedish International Development Agency).

Available from: 2018-08-01 Created: 2018-06-26 Last updated: 2018-08-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(520 kB)52 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 520 kBChecksum SHA-512
942b03e2f7492d1c396c2675ead252c52125bd8afab92db297de4421a46f42432c208f0585a4ef9ed74c2618e131628c901ca433db2e2c6057edd1edca6d5856
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences (starting 2013)
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 52 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 155 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf