Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Klassifikationssystemens påverkan på kalkylarbete: En jämförelse mellan CoClass och BSAB-systemen
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Building Technology and Design.
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Building Technology and Design.
2018 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (university diploma), 180 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
The impact of the classification system on the work with calculation : A comparison between CoClass and the BSAB-systems (English)
Abstract [sv]

I takt med att byggsektorn övergår till digital informationsmodellering av sina projekt ökar även behovet för att samordna och effektivisera hanteringen av denna information. Ett gemensamt språk i form av ett branschgemensamt klassifikationssystem kan leda till miljardbesparingar. Inom kalkyleringen är det viktigt att rätt informationshantering sker för att bidra till att en så noggrann kalkyl som möjligt kan utföras.

Syftet med studien är att undersöka hur de tre olika systemen, BSAB 83, BSAB 96 och CoClass, skiljer sig och ställa de i kontrast mot varandra för att påvisa dessa skillnader. Målet är att studien skall kunna ligga till grund för hur ÅF kan skapa kalkyler klassade enligt CoClass.

För att uppnå rapportens syfte och besvara frågeställningar har granskningen bestått av litteraturstudier, intervjuer, en komparativ studie och en fallstudie. Dessa metoder har bidragit i sin tur att resultatet av studien visade att ÅF skulle kunna övergå till CoClass på ett effektivt sätt. Vid jämförelsen mellan systemen har det visat sig att CoClass är ett mer omfattande och ett heltäckande system som struktureras på ett annat vis i motsats till de tidigare klassifikationssystemen.

Med hänsyn till studiens resultat kan en kalkylstruktur enligt CoClass implementeras i ÅF:s nuvarande arbetssätt, där färdiga recept för byggdelar fortfarande kan användas. Rekommendationen är att betrakta komponent-tabellen som likvärdig till produktionsresultatet vid kalkylarbete med CoClass struktur i MAP. Detta hade i det långa loppet varit en sund strategi, både ekonomiskt men främst tidsmässigt.

Abstract [en]

As the construction industry shifts to digital information modeling of its projects, the need to coordinate and improve the efficiency of the management of this information increases. A common language in the form of an industry-wide classification system could lead to billions in savings annually. In the calculation, it is important that the correct information management is included in order to provide the most accurate calculation possible.

The aim of this study is to examine how the three different systems, BSAB 83, BSAB 96 and CoClass, differ and stand in contrast to each other to highlight and demonstrate such differences. The purpose of the study is that it should be used as a basis for how ÅF can create classified calculations with CoClass.

To achieve the aim of the report and answer the research questions, the examination consisted of literature studies, interviews, a comparative study and a case study. These methods contributed to the following result: ÅF could effectively transfer to the CoClass system. When comparing the systems, it has been shown that CoClass is a more extensive and comprehensive system structured in a different way as opposed to the previous classification systems.

Based on the results of the study, a calculation structure according to CoClass can be implemented in ÅF's current working methods, where ready-made recipe for building components can still be used. The recommendation is to consider the component table as equivalent to the production result in the calculation work with CoClass structure in the MAP. In the long run, this would have been an efficient strategy, both economically and primarily less time-consuming.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. , p. 44
Series
TRITA-ABE-MBT ; 1889
Keywords [en]
BSAB 83, BSAB 96, Calculation, Classification system, CoClass, MAP, Structure.
Keywords [sv]
BSAB 83, BSAB 96, CoClass, Kalkyl, Klassifikationssystem, MAP, Struktur.
National Category
Construction Management
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-231101OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-231101DiVA, id: diva2:1222481
External cooperation
ÅF Infrastructure AB
Subject / course
Constructional Engineering and Design
Educational program
Bachelor of Science in Engineering - Constructional Engineering and Design
Presentation
2018-06-07, V42, Teknikringen 78A, Stockholm, 18:15 (Swedish)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2018-06-28 Created: 2018-06-21 Last updated: 2018-06-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3764 kB)6 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3764 kBChecksum SHA-512
8856225af66d3449f00f77501dbef21d4f0fa6af53d2b26e8996eb20491a4abe7c29e135d26a9b2ae41d70d04b96a9cb93e911fc14c98b39cd8ffe8c929e8458
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Building Technology and Design
Construction Management

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 6 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 34 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf