Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
ISOLERING UNDER HÄKTNINGSTIDEN: NÖDVÄNDIGT INGRIPANDE ELLER INTEGRITETSKRÄNKANDE?
Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.
Örebro University, School of Law, Psychology and Social Work.
2018 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [sv]

Studien undersökte samvarians mellan juriststudenters attityder till isolering under häktningstiden ur ett brottsutredande perspektiv, ur ett integritetskränkande perspektiv och den kritik som riktats mot det svenska rättssystemet. Det undersöktes även om dessa attityder skiljde sig åt mellan män och kvinnor. En enkät besvarades av 244 juriststudenter från fyra lärosäten i Sverige (106 män och 138 kvinnor, M = 23,6 år, SD = 3,0). Resultaten visade ett negativt starkt samband vilket indikerar att perspektiven står i kontrast till varandra. Perspektiven samvarierade även med kritiken, där de som uppvisade en mer accepterande attityd till isolering ur ett brottsutredande perspektiv var mindre benägna att hålla med om kritiken. De som istället uppvisade en mindre accepterande attityd till isolering ur ett integritetskränkande perspektiv var mer benägna att hålla med om kritiken. Samtliga samband var starkare för männen, dock var skillnaden i styrka på samband för män och kvinnor mellan de båda perspektiven inte signifikant. Det identifierades signifikanta könsskillnader då män uppvisade en mer accepterande attityd till isolering ur ett brottsutredande perspektiv samt i lägre utsträckning höll med om kritiken. Kvinnor uppvisade istället en mindre accepterande attityd till isolering ur ett integritetskränkande perspektiv och höll i högre utsträckning med om kritiken.

Abstract [en]

The study examined the association between law students’ attitudes towards solitary confinement in remand prisons from a criminal investigation perspective, a violation of integrity perspective and the criticism directed against the Swedish Criminal Justice System. Differences in these attitudes between men and women were also examined. A questionnaire was answered by 244 law students from four Swedish universities (106 males and 138 females, M = 23,6 years, SD = 3,0). The results showed a negative strong correlation indicating a contrast between the perspectives. The perspectives also correlated with the criticism, where those displaying a more favourable attitude from a criminal investigation perspective tended to disagree with the criticism. Those displaying a less favourable attitude from a violation of integrity perspective tended to agree with the criticism. All correlations were stronger for males. However, the difference in strength of correlation for males and females between the perspectives, was not significant. The study identified significant gender differences where males had a more favourable attitude from a criminal investigation perspective and, to a lesser extent, agreed with the criticism. Females had a less favourable attitude from a violation of integrity perspective and agreed with the criticism to a greater extent.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. , p. 34
Keywords [sv]
isolering under häktningstiden, juriststudenter, brottsutredning, integritet, attityder, könsskillnader
National Category
Other Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-67413OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-67413DiVA, id: diva2:1222268
Subject / course
Criminology
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2018-06-21 Created: 2018-06-21 Last updated: 2018-06-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

ISOLERING UNDER HÄKTNINGSTIDEN: NÖDVÄNDIGT INGRIPANDE ELLER INTEGRITETSKRÄNKANDE?(448 kB)17 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 448 kBChecksum SHA-512
79e984172658081f3647f632dea6d32b7b522a215aa5111245f9a748e0221e87651e09c1c14c8fb89ce22aff0e86f6192a96eeaf01226bab3532b882acf12e18
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Law, Psychology and Social Work
Other Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 17 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 197 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf