Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Beyond the Betrayal of Language: On the Role of Skepticism in Otherwise than Being
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy.
2018 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

In Otherwise than Being (1974), Levinas asked if and how philosophy could make justice of the concrete ethical meeting by philosophical practice, which is unconditionally conditioned by language. Language, understood as partly situated in being and ontology, is analysed as an appropriation of the other, who is other than being. Language could therefore according to Levinas never fully express the other – sometimes referred to as “otherism”. A condition, then, that needs to be fulfilled for philosophical practice to reach the goal of making justice for the other, and hence be meaningful in the Levinasian picture, is to transcend language through language. In the essay, I analyse through textual interpretation what appears to be a contradiction regarding Levinas’ answer to the possibility of transcendence through and by language in philosophy. On one hand, it appears as if philosophy could not overcome language through language, and that philosophical practice therefore is not meaningful. On the other hand, it appears as if sceptical discourse could overcome language through language. Scepticism might then be considered as the only meaningful practice and philosophy a game of deconstructive dialogue. Since skepticism is understood as a part of philosophy, this would imply that there is a contradiction. I argue that the contradiction could be understood as apparent when considering the criticism executed in Levinas’ analysis of language. I suggest that the contradiction is apparent because sceptical interchange is meaningful.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. , p. 40
Keywords [en]
levinas, metaphysics, discourse, metaphilosophy, scepticism, language philosophy, ethics, otherism, dialogue
Keywords [sv]
levinas, metafysik, diskurs, metafilosofi, skepticism, språkfilosofi, etik, dialog
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-353502OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-353502DiVA, id: diva2:1217624
Subject / course
Theoretical Philosophy
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2018-06-19 Created: 2018-06-13 Last updated: 2018-06-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(468 kB)12 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 468 kBChecksum SHA-512
c0f150b48898f996b09480df0475a2468817e72a014b1e68bd032bc962871a5c8feecb5bb076bf289734c045d214699f337d5b26062beb62d0d25082a64d17df
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Philosophy
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 12 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 333 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf