Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Cash Flow Simulation in Private Equity: An evaluation and comparison of two models
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics.
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics.
2018 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (professional degree), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

The uncertain pattern of cash flows poses a liquidity and risk management challenge for investors of private equity funds. The structure of a private equity investment, where the total committed capital will be paid out in portions at an undetermined schedule, makes it vital for the investor to have sufficient levels of cash in order to meet the called capital from the fund manager. As an investor can hold several investments, it is important to predict future cash flows in order to have effective cash management.

 

The purpose of this thesis is to increase the supporting institution’s knowledge in cash flow predictions of investments in private equity. To do this, an analysis and evaluation of two models have been executed for cash flow predictions from the view of a limited partner, i.e. the investor. The comparison is done between a deterministic model, the Yale model, that is currently used by the supporting institution to this thesis and a new stochastic model, the Stochastic model, that has been implemented during the work of this thesis.

 

The evaluation of the models has been done by backtests and with a coefficient of determination test, R2 test, of the Institution’s portfolio. It is hard to make an absolute conclusion on the performance of the two models as they outperform each other on different periods. Overall, the Yale model was better than the Stochastic model on the conducted tests, but the Stochastic model offers desirable attributes from a risk management perspective that the deterministic model lacks. This gives the Stochastic model potential to outperform the Yale model as a better option for cash flow simulation in private equity, provided a better parameter estimation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. , p. 43
National Category
Mathematics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-148620OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-148620DiVA, id: diva2:1216322
External cooperation
Case company
Educational program
Master of Science in Engineering and Management
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2018-06-18 Created: 2018-06-11 Last updated: 2018-06-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1412 kB)195 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1412 kBChecksum SHA-512
b8df03300d2b768022f13e30722d8e95c4c568a70650de1d6dab708487707b12097ecdfaec63a58892fffeb3e22ea86d2e757f1b05f231b4e08b5f18d7413735
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics
Mathematics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 195 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 326 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf