Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Collaborations in Routine Emergency Management: Lessons from Sweden
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Social Sciences. (RCR)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0202-0609
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Human Sciences, Department of Social Sciences. (RCR)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7316-4899
2018 (English)In: Procedia Engineering, ISSN 1877-7058, E-ISSN 1877-7058, Vol. 212, p. 302-308Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Effective collaborations in emergency management is the Holy Grail for practitioners in Sweden and elsewhere. More than mere coordination, interorganizational collaboration is deemed by many as the most optimal arrangement to share resources and respond to emergencies more quickly and efficiently. It is also considered to be the source of a broadly and rather vaguely defined concept of greater good. Such collaborations tend to be uncritically accepted as innovative, especially in instances of large-scale disasters or planned events while routine emergency management arrangements tend to be under researched. This research is an in-depth case study of an interorganizational collaboration in the greater Stockholm region in Sweden concerning routine emergency management. The collaboration comprises the physical relocation of one operator each from seven organizations in the area and the establishment of the “Collaboration Cluster”. Rather than attempt to define the concept of “greater good” we set out to evaluate the quality of collaboration from the perspective of each member organization. We build a multi-dimensional model to assess the expectations of each organization at the political, managerial, and operative level. What is more, we view the Collaboration Cluster as a network at the operative level and for this reason we employ formal Social Network Analysis (SNA) to tease out network variables that have an effect on the quality of collaboration.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 212, p. 302-308
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-33096DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.039Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85043385733OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-33096DiVA, id: diva2:1186069
Conference
7th International Conference on Building Resilience, ICBR 2017; Swissotel Le Concorde Bangkok; Thailand; 27 November 2017 through 29 November 2017
Funder
Swedish Civil Contingencies AgencyAvailable from: 2018-02-27 Created: 2018-02-27 Last updated: 2018-03-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(477 kB)41 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 477 kBChecksum SHA-512
8e591870a443b37f736522b9e072ef862abeed0ab102aaf78cb7a92833cafb8c62a52cf0250582cb30dbe1b9e05b248a4712b4f7eb9051dd86bfe74a502838e7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sparf, JörgenPetridou, Evangelia
By organisation
Department of Social Sciences
In the same journal
Procedia Engineering
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 41 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 68 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf