Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
I’m sure women use more hedges, I think: A study comparing male and female usage of hedges
University of Gävle, Faculty of Education and Business Studies, Department of Humanities.
2018 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

This study reexamines Lakoff’s (1973) claim that women use more hedges than men is true. Because of the vast number of hedges, this study focuses on two hedges: I think and I’m sure. It also investigates how the included hedges are used by men and women to express belief and opinion. The study has been carried out with the help of a corpus called British National Corpus 2014 (BNC2014). From this database, authentic conversations that include these hedges in clause-final position have been extracted. By using the extracted and processed data, a conclusion can be drawn regarding similarities and differences in how often men and women use these hedges and in what context they are used. The results show that Lakoff’s (1973) claim has a certain truth to it, since 63.0% of the valid I think tokens and 67.6% of the valid I’m sure tokens were produced by women. As for the expression of belief or opinion, the results points towards I think and I’m sure upholding traditional gender traits.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. , p. 28
Keywords [en]
Hedges, I think, I’m sure, pragmaticalization, grammaticalization
National Category
General Language Studies and Linguistics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-26186OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-26186DiVA, id: diva2:1185931
Subject / course
English
Educational program
Upper Secondary Teacher Education Programme
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2018-03-06 Created: 2018-02-26 Last updated: 2018-03-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(452 kB)41 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 452 kBChecksum SHA-512
a420e3baeced3e0184ecb560ae6ad86339a353e732e70d0f3884045c5834c192748765a28e6462975aac21f6a28a3d9a783c4f6d1d77484f2f09c0ed90f8d17a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Humanities
General Language Studies and Linguistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 41 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 183 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf