Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Utvärdering av app-ramverk: En jämförelse av JavaScript-ramverken React Native och Ionic
KTH, School of Information and Communication Technology (ICT).
KTH, School of Information and Communication Technology (ICT).
2017 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [sv]

Denna uppsats beskriver arbetet av att jämföra och utvärdera JavaScript-ramverken React Native och Ionic, med avseende på utveckling av mobila applikationer och kriterierna prestanda, community, plugin och utvecklingsförmåga.

Syftet var att jämföra React Native och Ionic för att ge ökad information och underlag vid val av JavaScript-ramverk kopplat till mobil applikationsutveckling. Kriterierna bestämdes genom en förstudie och validerades och rangordnades genom intervjuer med experter.

Resultatet av denna uppsats blev väldigt jämnt med enbart ett fåtal poängs skillnad med fördel till Ionic. Båda JavaScript-ramverken är bra alternativ vid utveckling av mobila applikationer och det mest lämpade ramverket beror mycket på vilka kriterier man väljer samt hur man poängsätter kriterierna.

För framtida utveckling kan kriterier och scenarier utökas ytterligare för att få ett större underlag och ett mer varierat resultat.

Abstract [en]

This degree project describes the work of comparing and evaluating the JavaScript-frameworks React Native and Ionic, with respect to mobile application development and the criteria performance, community, plugin, and evolvability.

The purpose was to compare React Native and Ionic to provide increased information and support for selecting JavaScript-framework associated with mobile application development.

Criteria were determined by a feasibility study and validated and ranked by interviews with experts.

The result of this degree project became very even with only a few points difference with the benefit of Ionic. Both JavaScript-frameworks are good alternatives in developing mobile applications, and the most appropriate framework depends greatly on which criteria you choose and how you score the criteria.

For future development, criteria and scenarios can be further expanded to get a better foundation and a more varied result.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. , p. 56
Series
TRITA-ICT-EX ; 2017:71
National Category
Computer and Information Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-222377OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-222377DiVA, id: diva2:1181215
Subject / course
Information and Communication Technology
Educational program
Master of Science in Engineering - Information and Communication Technology
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2018-02-08 Created: 2018-02-08 Last updated: 2018-02-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1686 kB)52 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1686 kBChecksum SHA-512
8c33aef9b3069e7e6a3cf49f7bd736cdf18013a43405cc3900c65403acfaa63010935926b6c237eea2e526390304b4e6137fbcc48a6b7f747fd92a14bb770802
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Information and Communication Technology (ICT)
Computer and Information Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 52 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 215 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf