Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Prestanda av interior gateway protocol i olika nätverkstopologier
Mälardalen University, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering.
2018 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [sv]

Rapporten jämför nätverkskonvergenstid, genomströmning och CPU-användning mellanroutingprotokollen RIPv2, OSPF och EIGRP. Jämförelsen görs i olika miljöer, varjeroutingprotokoll testas enskilt i en liten och stor ring-, star- och partial mesh-topologi, sedan görs mätningar i en miljö med återdistribution med kombination av två samt tre protokoll.Mätningarna visar att EIGRP är mest balanserad av de tre protokollen, i de topologier som har använts. Konvergenstiden för EIGRP ändras inte vid byte av topologi. Mätningarna visar dessutom att RIPv2 har bättre nätverkskonvergenstid jämfört med OSPF i star topologi, vilket beror på att denna topologi har en låg max hopcount. OSPF har dock bättre nätverkskonvergenstid jämfört med RIPv2 i alla andra scenarion, där RIPv2 har en max hopcount som överskrider 1. RIPv2 har lägst CPU-användning i alla topologier som används.I en miljö med återdistribution visar mätningarna att RIPv2-EIGRP har bäst nätverkskonvergenstid, samt näst högst genomströmning. RIPv2-OSPF-EIGRP och OSPF-EIGRP har näst lägst nätverkskonvergenstid. De har dessutom högst CPU-användning.

Abstract [en]

This report compares network convergence time, throughput and CPU utilization between the routing protocols RIPv2, OSPF and EIGRP. The comparison is done in different environments, every routing protocol is tested separately in a small and large ring, star and partial mesh topology. Measurements are also done in an environment with redistribution with a combination of two and three protocols.The measurements show that EIGRP is the most balanced of the three protocols, in the topologies that were used. Network convergence time for EIGRP does not change when using different topologies. Measurements also show that RIPv2 has a better network convergence time compared to OSPF in a star topology, which is due to the fact that this topology has a low max hop count. However, OSPF has a better network convergence time compared to RIPv2 in all other scenarios, where RIPv2 has a max hop count that exceeds 1. RIPv2 has the lowest CPU utilization in all the topologies.In an environment with redistribution, measurements show that RIPv2-EIGRP has the best network convergence time, and second highest throughput. RIPv2-OSPF-EIGRP and OSPF-EIGRP has the second lowest network convergence time. They also have the highest CPU utilization.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018.
National Category
Engineering and Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-38417OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-38417DiVA, id: diva2:1178499
Subject / course
Innovation & design
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2018-02-06 Created: 2018-01-29 Last updated: 2018-02-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1572 kB)28 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1572 kBChecksum SHA-512
2f8815fe8d3b35d1e2936f1ac583eb7cb99b888238649d2931eeadbc4dc923aca1dc99bde5805e6047c6376f6e53347909aac8deb3f7e3d61a9bdd3b3fbc407a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Innovation, Design and Engineering
Engineering and Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 28 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 219 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf