Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Normative Dilemmas in Sweden's Ethical Review Policy for Animal Experiments
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0550-4710
2017 (English)In: Global Journal of Animal Law, ISSN 2341-8168, Vol. 5, no 2, p. 102-134Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Animal experimentation is a contentious ethical issue. In many countries, the debate over the morality of animal research has led to the institution of ethical review systems for animal experiments. This article discusses and problematizes the current regulations, policies, and recommendations governing the ethical review of animal experiments in Sweden. It is argued that the ongoing paradigm shift in society’s view of animals prompts a serious re-evaluation of the values underpinning the routine use of sentient nonhumans animals in research. Following from this, two lines of argument are pursued in the article. First, I make the claim that the organizational and administrative exigencies of the current ethical committee system in Sweden is likely to work to the animals’ disadvantage and undermine a fair assessment of their interests. Second, and more importantly, I reconstruct the utilitarian principles that the ethical review is supposed to be based on and argue that the reasons given for choosing utilitarian standards are undeveloped and reveal an justifiable  speciesist bias. Moreover, I argue that even if we should accept these principles, the existing ethical review system would fail to meet the demands of a consistent utilitarian calculus, mainly due to its outdated understanding of how animal models work and what they allow us to predict.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 5, no 2, p. 102-134
Keyword [en]
Animal experiments, Animal experimentation, Vivisection, Animal rights, Animal protection, Animal welfare, Animal ethics committees, Speciesism
National Category
Political Science
Research subject
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-151650OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-151650DiVA, id: diva2:1174784
Available from: 2018-01-16 Created: 2018-01-16 Last updated: 2018-05-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(810 kB)18 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 810 kBChecksum SHA-512
5aa9cbf90acc2698ee42cd402af243408db00a9045f43f969eca56e9a90f5d4b4cd73e5d484621cbeaa5990210996cb1b45334cfc9e93c5cd91bbe485c0bd903
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Free full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Svärd, Per-Anders
By organisation
Department of Political Science
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 18 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 38 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf