Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Cultural Universals and Cultural Differences in Meta-Norms about Peer Punishment
Mälardalen University, School of Education, Culture and Communication, Educational Sciences and Mathematics. Stockholm University, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7164-0924
Stockholm University, Sweden.
Linköping University, Sweden.
American University of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: Management and Organization Review, ISSN 1740-8776, E-ISSN 1740-8784, Vol. 13, no 4, p. 851-870Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Violators of cooperation norms may be informally punished by their peers. How such norm enforcement is judged by others can be regarded as a meta-norm (i.e., a second-order norm). We examined whether meta-norms about peer punishment vary across cultures by having students in eight countries judge animations in which an agent who over-harvested a common resource was punished either by a single peer or by the entire peer group. Whether the punishment was retributive or restorative varied between two studies, and findings were largely consistent across these two types of punishment. Across all countries, punishment was judged as more appropriate when implemented by the entire peer group than by an individual. Differences between countries were revealed in judgments of punishers vs. non-punishers. Specifically, appraisals of punishers were relatively negative in three Western countries and Japan, and more neutral in Pakistan, UAE, Russia, and China, consistent with the influence of individualism, power distance, and/or indulgence. Our studies constitute a first step in mapping how meta-norms vary around the globe, demonstrating both cultural universals and cultural differences. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cambridge University Press , 2017. Vol. 13, no 4, p. 851-870
National Category
Law and Society Social Anthropology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-38010DOI: 10.1017/mor.2017.42ISI: 000418853700009Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85039927743OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-38010DiVA, id: diva2:1173035
Available from: 2018-01-11 Created: 2018-01-11 Last updated: 2018-03-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(334 kB)24 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 334 kBChecksum SHA-512
245008307dc44d9c51da341f37df8795e7a82a181a5681d398d5255cc7acf707b867531c10bfec7502a41292f6bd4a02e85d870329fb79781f6ee4bda66da4d8
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eriksson, Kimmo
By organisation
Educational Sciences and Mathematics
In the same journal
Management and Organization Review
Law and SocietySocial Anthropology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 24 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 25 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf