Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Improved data validity in the Swedish Register of Palliative Care
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4126-2675
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences. (Unit of Clinical Research Centre–Östersund)
2017 (English)In: PLoS ONE, ISSN 1932-6203, E-ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 12, no 10, article id e0186804Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: The Swedish Register of Palliative Care (SRPC) is a national quality register that collects data about end-of-life care from healthcare providers that care for dying patients. Data are used for quality control and research. Data are mainly collected with an end-of-life questionnaire (ELQ), which is completed by healthcare staff after the death of a patient. A previous validity assessment of the ELQ showed insufficient validity in some items including symptom relief. The aim of this study was to examine the validity of the revised ELQ. Materials and methods: Data from 100 consecutive patients' medical records at two specialised palliative care units were used to complete new ELQs, which were then compared to the ELQ registrations from the SRPC for the same patients. The level of agreement was calculated for each ELQ item. To account for the possibility of the agreement occurring by chance, Cohen's kappa was calculated for suitable items. To examine the extent of registration mistakes when transferring the paper form to the web, the original paper versions of the ELQ filled out at the units were compared to data from the ELQs reported to the SRPC. Results: Level of agreement between ELQ registrations from the SRPC and the new ELQs based on the medical records varied between 0.55 and 1.00, where 24 items showed level of agreement above 0.80 and 9 items showed level of agreement below 0.80. Cohen's kappa with 95% confidence intervals was calculated for 24 items. The kappa values showed that two items had poor agreement, four fair agreement, 11 moderate agreement, five good agreement and two very good agreement. The level of agreement varied between 0.93 and 1.00 when comparing the ELQ registrations in the SRPC and the paper forms. Conclusion: The revised ELQ contains more items with high levels of agreement between registrations in the SRPC and notes in the patients' medical records when compared to the previous version. Validating issues around symptom assessment remains a challenge in our model of quality assessment.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Public library science , 2017. Vol. 12, no 10, article id e0186804
National Category
Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-141815DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186804ISI: 000413195900114PubMedID: 29049396OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-141815DiVA, id: diva2:1160576
Available from: 2017-11-27 Created: 2017-11-27 Last updated: 2017-11-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(781 kB)10 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 781 kBChecksum SHA-512
b9617f129a0499f2eb89a516003a7d98aba24962f08480d88831d7df62dfcce766c2c3ce0111b922a9f97e276e2500fec6a0478949a1a79f766366ee39665ccb
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Martinsson, LisaAxelsson, Bertil
By organisation
Department of Radiation Sciences
In the same journal
PLoS ONE
Cancer and Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 10 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 29 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
v. 2.34-SNAPSHOT
|