Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Max Scheler på norska?: Om ursprunget till "Deltakar og tilskodar"
Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Sociology. (Interkulturella studier)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1702-0182
2017 (Swedish)In: Norsk sosiologisk tidsskrift, ISSN 1590-7929, E-ISSN 1936-4660, Vol. 1, no 5, 365-379 p., 05-02Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Hans Skjervheim was one of the most influential philosophers of social science in the Scandinavian countries during the twentieth century. This paper contributes to the understanding of one of his central meta-scientific distinctions – between the participant and the spectator – by relating him to surprisingly similar distinctions found in the works of Max Scheler. It is well-known that Skjervheim studied Scheler, but the latter’s direct (and partly unacknowledged) influence on Skjervheim’s central distinction has not been noticed. Through an examination of similarities between Skjervheim and Scheler, an interpretation of Skjervheim is reached, which renders, so the paper additionally argues, some contemporary criticism of his work less valid than might be thought.

Abstract [sv]

Denna artikel försöker visa att Hans Skjervheims välkända och inflytelserika distinktion mellan «deltakar og tilskodar» har en i stora delar direkt motsvarighet i Max Schelers arbeten från 1910-talet, och argumenterar vidare för att Skjervheim, som var välbekant med Schelers arbeten, faktiskt har hämtat de centrala tankegångarna i essän «Deltakar og tilskodar» från dessa. Denna tolkning kastar visst nytt ljus över Skjervheims arbete och kan i någon mån bidra till att försvara detta mot samtida kritik. På så vis avser denna artikel att dels utgöra ett litet bidrag till den norska positivismkritikens historia, dels bidra till tolkningen av ett av dess mest kända verk.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oslo, 2017. Vol. 1, no 5, 365-379 p., 05-02
Keyword [en]
positivism, philosophy of social science, understanding, hermeneutics, objectivation
Keyword [sv]
positivism, vetenskapsteori, förståelse, hermeneutik, objektivering
National Category
Sociology
Research subject
Intercultural Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-26482DOI: 10.18261/issn.2535-2512-2017-05-02OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-26482DiVA: diva2:1153960
Available from: 2017-11-01 Created: 2017-11-01 Last updated: 2017-11-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2139 kB)2 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2139 kBChecksum SHA-512
a551264cf90db4d36d6c2bdc9ac55e1ab55c4bbb85715d5504e95277de48e4074643dd9d1d82af0bf21d14ba9ff38dc5a0c7812d20ecdfcf117609ad5003f6d3
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wide, Sverre
By organisation
Sociology
In the same journal
Norsk sosiologisk tidsskrift
Sociology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 2 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 21 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf