Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Division of housework and his and her view of housework fairness: A typology of Swedish couples
University of Melbourne, Australia.
Stockholm University, Sweden.
Stockholm University, Sweden.
2017 (English)In: Demographic Research, ISSN 1435-9871, Vol. 36, p. 501-524, article id 16Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

<b>Background</b>: Housework studies have long documented a fairness paradox, whereby unequal divisions of housework are evaluated as fair. Gender equality, both at home and at work, is strongly normative in a highly egalitarian country like Sweden, but not always matched by an equally egalitarian situation in the family which are often viewed as fair. <b>Objective</b>: To explore the relationship between housework-sharing and perceived fairness of this division, using both partners’ reports, to identify how Swedish couples cluster across these measures and what individual characteristics predict cluster membership. <b>Methods</b>: Using the couple-level design of the 2009 wave of the Young Adult Panel Study (YAPS, n=1,026), we are able to advance the research field and evaluate housework experience within broader couple dynamics. Our approach is exploratory and develops a typology using latent class analysis. <b>Results</b>: We identify six latent groups, with distinct features. The modal Swedish-couple category comprises those who share housework equally and agree that this arrangement is fair (33% of the couples). Applying a distributive justice perspective, we find that childhood socialization, presence of children in the household, and the distribution of employment, education, income, and egalitarianism across couples are important predictors of cluster membership. <b>Conclusions</b>: We find that equal-sharing/fair couples are most common in the Swedish context, suggesting clear benefits from Sweden’s expansive gender policies. Yet, there seems to be a generational divide, whereby Swedish women who witnessed housework inequality in their parental home are increasingly dissatisfied when this inequality replicates in their own lives. <b>Contribution</b>: Demonstrating that housework allocations, conflict and fairness may reflect different types of couples rather than associations across those measures.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 36, p. 501-524, article id 16
National Category
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-142377DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2017.36.16OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-142377DiVA, id: diva2:1153367
Available from: 2017-10-30 Created: 2017-10-30 Last updated: 2017-11-16

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(174 kB)6 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 174 kBChecksum SHA-512
7e4c05cbcdce7b558a60560975431d860165627f97bfac9b49257edc33e89fc55fbc666c5ed2cf5cc8033621466aa7caa93389ac269e1e3559b4aefd3b9bcccf
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full texthttps://www.demographic-research.org/special/20/16/

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Brandén, Maria
In the same journal
Demographic Research
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 6 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 106 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf