Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The use of court- and party-appointed experts in legal proceedings in Sweden: the judges experiences and attitudes
Senior lecturer in Sociology of Law, Lund University.
Linköping University, Department of Social and Welfare Studies, Social Work. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
2017 (English)In: Oslo Law Review, E-ISSN 2387-3299, Vol. 4, no 2, p. 63-81Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article focuses on the use of expert knowledge as a basis for legal decisions in serious criminal cases. Using a model that describes rhetorical situations, as well as empirical material based on 150 court decisions, the aim is to analyse the conditions surrounding the use of expert evidence in criminal law processes, to what extent and by whom such evidence is used, and how it affects the outcome of the cases. The rhetorical situation in criminal cases is reconstructed to include the exigence (urgent issue that requires addressing) and, thereby, the related discourse, in order to retrieve relevant conditions, which could be identified as evidentially favourable or unfavourable to the suspect and the prosecutor respectively. It is concluded that there is a theoretical imbalance between the parties to the benefit of the defendant. Empirically grounded analysis of the criminal cases shows, however, that the defendant’s theoretical advantage does not correspond to the actual situation in court. The results indicate that the defendant usually adopts a passive stance and therefore does not use favourable constraints effectively. The study also shows that the defendant’s chances of winning the case increase when they use written expert evidence and expert witnesses.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oslo, Norway: Universitetet i Oslo , 2017. Vol. 4, no 2, p. 63-81
Keywords [en]
Legal reasoning; expert knowledge; criminal law process; rhetorical situation; rhetorical constraints
National Category
Law and Society
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-141954DOI: 10.18261/issn.2387-3299-2017-02-01OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-141954DiVA, id: diva2:1149297
Funder
Swedish Research CouncilAvailable from: 2017-10-15 Created: 2017-10-15 Last updated: 2018-05-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1277 kB)7 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1277 kBChecksum SHA-512
dff3c0ed8ecdf2ae994099dbaadd2a85a3e4b657854798a79d65fb42d1f4ebb907380a2f4822056ab561a2b8608c73a7e3943d288d2aca41607dda9358f924ba
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Åström, Karsten
By organisation
Social WorkFaculty of Arts and Sciences
Law and Society

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 7 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 81 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf