Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparison of Punching Shear Design Provisions for Flat Slabs
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Concrete Structures.
KTH, School of Architecture and the Built Environment (ABE), Civil and Architectural Engineering, Concrete Structures.
2017 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Abstract

A new generation of EN 1992-1-1 (2004) also known as Eurocode 2 is under development

and currently there is a set of proposed provisions regarding section 6.4

about punching shear, PT1prEN 1992-1-1(2017). It was of interest to compare the

proposal with the current punching shear design provisions.

The aim of this master thesis was to compare the punching shear resistance obtained

in accordance with both design codes. Furthermore the eect of some parameters

on the resistance was to be compared. It was also of interest to evaluate the userfriendliness

of the proposal.

In order to meet the aim, a case study of a real  at slab with drop panels was performed

together with a parametric study of a pure ctive  at slab. The parametric

study was performed for inner, edge and corner columns in the cases prestressed,

without and with shear reinforcement.

It was concluded that the distance

av from the column axis to the contra  exural

location has a big in uence on the punching shear resistance. The factor

ddg

considering concrete type and aggregate properties also has a big impact on the resistance.

The simplied estimation of

av according to 6.4.3(2) in PT1prEN 1992-1-1

(2017) may be inaccurate in some cases.

The length

b0 of the control perimeter has a larger eect on the resistance in EN

1992-1-1 (2004) than in PT1prEN 1992-1-1 (2017).

In PT1prEN 1992-1-1 (2017), studs located outside the second row has no impact

on the resistance.

The tensioning force in a prestressed  at slab has a larger in uence on the resistance

in PT1prEN 1992-1-1 (2017) than in EN 1992-1-1 (2004). Furthermore,

the reinforcement ratio is increased by the tendons, and thus aect the resistance in

PT1prEN 1992-1-1 (2017).

Clearer provisions for the denition of the support strip

bs for corners and ends

of walls are needed in PT1prEN 1992-1-1 (2017).

It may be questionable if the reduction of the perimeter for a large supported area in

accordance with 6.4.2(4) in PT1prEN 1992-1-1 (2017) underestimates the resistance

v

in some cases.

Considering the work-load with PT1prEN 1992-1-1 (2017), more parameters are

included. However, they may not require that much eort to obtain.

Keywords: Punching shear, resistance, concrete,  at slab, design provisions, Eurocode

2, case study, parametric study, shear reinforcement, prestressed

vi

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. , p. 144
Series
ISRN KTH/BKN/EX-517-SE ; 517
Keywords [en]
Punching shear, resistance, concrete, flat slab, design provisions, Eurocode 2, case study, parametric study, shear reinforcement, prestressed
National Category
Building Technologies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-215631OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-215631DiVA, id: diva2:1148418
External cooperation
Tyréns
Subject / course
Concrete Structures
Educational program
Master of Science in Engineering - Urban Management
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2017-10-13 Created: 2017-10-11 Last updated: 2017-10-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(4426 kB)301 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4426 kBChecksum SHA-512
0542936d78a565fd0c83fdb71e4bd96ae31294dd1389d079cb56baeb9bc2f23d328c2585495425497b4c4a95db9c32db242faeb403447378c5f521189347d052
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
fulltext(4426 kB)79 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 4426 kBChecksum SHA-512
0542936d78a565fd0c83fdb71e4bd96ae31294dd1389d079cb56baeb9bc2f23d328c2585495425497b4c4a95db9c32db242faeb403447378c5f521189347d052
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Concrete Structures
Building Technologies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 380 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1138 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf