Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
En jämförelse mellan raiseborrning och vajersågning för drivning av vertikala schakt i berg
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Mining and Geotechnical Engineering.
2017 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

In this thesis the two non-blasting methods, raise boring and wire sawing, have been studied for the making of vertical shafts in rock. The methods have been compared to each other to see which similarities and differences there are. The comparison is directed towards shafts made in an urban environment when drilling and blasting can’t be used because of impact restrictions on the surrounding buildings. The purpose of the study is to clarify under which specific conditions a particular method is most suitable for use. A third method, thermal spallation, has also been studied to see if the method, which today is used in quarrying operations only, can be used for making vertical shafts in an urban environment.      

The report includes detailed descriptions of the three methods based on a literature review and has been completed with relevant information from an interview study, adding personal experiences of people who have worked with the methods. Case studies of shafts which have been executed by wire sawing or raise boring have also been done. Information about the time and cost have been collected from the respondents and analyzed. The focus of the work has been to create a understanding of how the two techniques differ on the following points; time, cost, length and inclination of the shaft, dimensions of the cross section, working area and establishment, impacts on the surrounding, rock quality/geology and support and sealing. A survey of the companies who work with the methods in Sweden has also been made.

The result shows that the methods are similar in many ways, but the areas were they differ the most are time, cost, shaft length, inclination, and dimension of the cross section. Raise boring is more suitable for longer shafts and is a reliable method, especially if the shaft is inclined. Wire sawing is a flexible method were the shape of the cross section can have many different forms and only the rock that is cut loose sets the limitations.

The case studies and the time analysis shows that raise boring is a faster method than wire sawing for the making of shafts, mainly because the rock that was cut loose with the wire got stuck in the shafts in many of the cases. The general cost analysis that was done shows that wire sawing is the cheapest alternative when the length of the shaft is shorter than 40 – 50 m. The reason for this is mainly that the cost of the establishment is 10 times higher for raise boring than for wire sawing.

Based on the results and conclusions from this study a table has been made with guidelines for choosing which method to use in future projects.

Thermal spallation as it is today is a technique which can‘t be used in an urban environment. With modifications to the required equipment, the method could compete with wire sawing and raise boring in the future. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. , 62 p.
Keyword [sv]
Schakt, raiseborr, vajersåg, termisk spjälkning
National Category
Infrastructure Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-63668OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-63668DiVA: diva2:1104754
External cooperation
Ramböll Sverige AB
Subject / course
Student thesis, at least 30 credits
Educational program
Civil Engineering, master's level (120 credits)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2017-06-15 Created: 2017-06-01 Last updated: 2017-06-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2408 kB)27 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2408 kBChecksum SHA-512
e4a8551323ae828fe6d2f61db7e5d87837274bbe5ac38d8177e14235257b1d2e345ec0e245875e378029aece4c7d1b867f63ac192ba7161062309808ce9c4d6d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hedgärde, Karl
By organisation
Mining and Geotechnical Engineering
Infrastructure Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 27 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 75 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf