Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Exploring similarities and differences in hospital adverse event rates between Norway and Sweden using Global Trigger Tool
Norwegian Directorate Heatlh, Norway; Akershus University Hospital, Norway.
Region Östergötland, Local Health Care Services in West Östergötland, Research & Development Unit in Local Health Care.
Norwegian Comp Centre, Norway.
Akershus University Hospital, Norway.
Show others and affiliations
2017 (English)In: BMJ Open, ISSN 2044-6055, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 7, e012492Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: In this paper, we explore similarities and differences in hospital adverse event (AE) rates between Norway and Sweden by reviewing medical records with the Global Trigger Tool (GTT). Design: All acute care hospitals in both countries performed medical record reviews, except one in Norway. Records were randomly selected from all eligible admissions in 2013. Eligible admissions were patients 18 years of age or older, undergoing care with an in-hospital stay of at least 24 hours, excluding psychiatric and care and rehabilitation. Reviews were done according to GTT methodology. Setting: Similar contexts for healthcare and similar socioeconomic and demographic characteristics have inspired the Nordic countries to exchange experiences from measuring and monitoring quality and patient safety in healthcare. The co-operation has promoted the use of GTT to monitor national and local rates of AEs in hospital care. Participants: 10 986 medical records were reviewed in Norway and 19 141 medical records in Sweden. Results: No significant difference between overall AE rates was found between the two countries. The rate was 13.0% (95% CI 11.7% to 14.3%) in Norway and 14.4% ( 95% CI 12.6% to 16.3%) in Sweden. There were significantly higher AE rates of surgical complications in Norwegian hospitals compared with Swedish hospitals. Swedish hospitals had significantly higher rates of pressure ulcers, falls and other AEs. Among more severe AEs, Norwegian hospitals had significantly higher rates of surgical complications than Swedish hospitals. Swedish hospitals had significantly higher rates of postpartum AEs. Conclusions: The level of patient safety in acute care hospitals, as assessed by GTT, was essentially the same in both countries. The differences between the countries in the rates of several types of AEs provide new incentives for Norwegian and Swedish governing bodies to address patient safety issues.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP , 2017. Vol. 7, e012492
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-136667DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012492ISI: 000397876500042PubMedID: 28320786OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-136667DiVA: diva2:1089749
Note

Funding Agencies|Akershus University Hospitals Health Services Research Unit; Norwegian Computing Center; Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (SALAR)

Available from: 2017-04-20 Created: 2017-04-20 Last updated: 2017-05-08

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(752 kB)18 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 752 kBChecksum SHA-512
71487b54b7277c8692077776dd77bec30a90829b75d31187283797d2c740f6a20226c776f5766baca4675ad8db6d47fe904138f43b159225fa9b07b6b8779b0f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Borgstedt Risberg, MadeleineRutberg, Hans
By organisation
Research & Development Unit in Local Health CareDivision of Health Care AnalysisFaculty of Medicine and Health SciencesDepartment of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery
In the same journal
BMJ Open
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 18 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 38 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf