Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Frihet i Tiden: Diskussion och användande av begreppet frihet i den socialdemokratiska idéskriften Tiden 1915-1920 och betydelsen av detta för partisplittringen 1917.
Stockholm University, Faculty of Humanities, Department of Culture and Aesthetics.
2016 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

In 1917, the Swedish socialist party SAP, Sveriges Socialdemokratiska Arbetarparti, was split in two. A more radical, leftish fraction broke out and became SSV, Sveriges Socialdemokratiska Vänsterparti (today Vänsterpartiet). The party division is often explained with different attitudes concerning parliamentarism and militarisation – a more compromising one and a more revolutionary and defence nihilist one – that in a time of world war and revolutions led to insurmountable disagreements. Several of the party members thought that the division would not be permanent, as it became. The cementation of the separation suggests that there were more fundamental differences between the leaving fraction and the remaining SAP than just short-sighted political questions such as the WW1. This essay investigates the concept of freedom in the social democratic discourse to discover whether different views and usage of the concept of freedom might indicate greater ideological differences that cemented the division. This is a thorough study of the Social Democrat magazine Tiden during the period 1915-1920, with this purpose. To see the differences properly, a theoretical background on freedom is made, where the differences between liberal, socialist and Leninist freedom together with the ideas of freedom to and freedom from, as well as Isaiah Berlins concepts of positive and negative freedom are distinguished and examined. After the examination of the material, the conclusion is drawn that the views on and ideas of freedom vary greatly, and that it is very likely that it did have an impact on the division, especially in a long-term perspective.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. , p. 32
Keywords [en]
Swedish Social Democrats, freedom, ideology, Marxism, party division
Keywords [sv]
Socialdemokraterna, frihet, ideologi, marxism, partisplittring, Tiden
National Category
Humanities
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-139858OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-139858DiVA, id: diva2:1074957
Supervisors
Available from: 2017-03-02 Created: 2017-02-16 Last updated: 2017-03-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(556 kB)114 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 556 kBChecksum SHA-512
8ea61b71928e4fa2cb11f236d47963fd3b32e48f3af7240256e2071969d413de235ed5551efad68e21e6e1bacd9b08ec21993167d3a60bfade15c32457ad32d4
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Culture and Aesthetics
Humanities

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 114 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 751 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf