Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Is Superdiversity a Useful Concept in European Medical Sociology?
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology. (Welfare and lifecourse)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0664-1170
Pebl Feedback C.I.C., Colchester, UK.
Pebl Feedback C.I.C., Colchester, UK.
Department of Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
2017 (English)In: Frontiers in Sociology, E-ISSN 2297-7775, Vol. 1, article id 17Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Medical sociology has a poor track record of researching diversity in theoretically innovative ways. This paper notes usage of the term superdiversity in migration and urban studies, to ask about its utility in general and more specifically for researching the social production of health and illness. Referring to a multi-country interview study about healthcare seeking strategies, the need to understand the diversification of diversity and the challenges for multi-method health research are described. Six interviews each were conducted in Germany, Spain, Sweden, and the UK, to give a diversity sample of 24 adults who described their strategies and practice when seeking healthcare. In discussing how far superdiversity can help to model socioeconomic and cultural changes already identified as challenging health policy and service provision, the paper draws on case study material. The complex intersecting dimensions of population diversity to which superdiversity draws attention are undoubtedly relevant for commissioning and improving healthcare and research as well as policy. Whether models that reflect the complexity indicated by qualitative research can be envisaged in a timely fashion for quantitative research and questions of policy, commissioning, and research are key questions for superdiversity’s ongoing usefulness as a concept.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. Vol. 1, article id 17
National Category
Sociology
Research subject
Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-313837DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2016.00017OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-313837DiVA, id: diva2:1068335
Available from: 2017-01-25 Created: 2017-01-25 Last updated: 2017-01-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(201 kB)122 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 201 kBChecksum SHA-512
ecc182c29a39596087e1fe67307ed8afc93b7b658d7e23ec01a15736bb95d4122c48e871fc2867f19d1f9bf63901cc24d9899a70ab720b23661461292b449b7d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full texthttp://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fsoc.2016.00017/full

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bradby, Hannah
By organisation
Department of Sociology
Sociology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 122 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 565 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf