Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Abuse of Dominant Position in China and the EU: A Comparative Legal Study
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Languages, Department of Linguistics and Philology.
2017 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

This thesis presents the Chinese and European competition laws on abuse of dominant position. The thesis starts with an introduction, and goes on to present the purpose of the study, which is to determine the similarities and differences between the Chinese and European prohibitions on ADP. 

     After the introductory part, consisting of background, method, material and previos research, the respective prohibitions are described in different aspects. The aspects are namely system, purpose, scope of application, what constitutes dominance and what constitutes abuse. Thereafter, the two prohibitions are compared. In the comparison, similarities are presented such as similar purposes, similar scope of application, very similar in what constitutes a dominant position and abuse. The systematics however differ more, and so do the rules on extraterritorial application.

     In the concluding remarks, the results of the thesis are highlighted and the author shortly analyses the results..

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2017. , p. 50
Keyword [en]
Chinese competition law, European competition law, Competition law, Comparative law, Anti-monopoly law, Tencent vs Qihoo
National Category
Specific Languages
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-313600OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-313600DiVA: diva2:1067582
Subject / course
Chinese
Presentation
(Swedish)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2017-02-07 Created: 2017-02-07 Last updated: 2018-01-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(785 kB)158 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 785 kBChecksum SHA-512
ef49fc0b7749fe55235a19dd0c2ddfdd8aec11bed350a1c33d1ab71bccd4ead399a7064c872ec697e39cc3ecbc734bf9617266993cf8bd1e103b636745038939
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Linguistics and Philology
Specific Languages

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 158 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 614 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf