Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
¿Opiniones, normas o pura necesidad?: La modalidad deóntica y la modalidad dinámica a través de deber tener que
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Languages, Department of Modern Languages.
2017 (Spanish)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This study focuses on the notions of deontic and dynamic modality in Spanish and how they are expressed through the modal verbs deber ‘must’ and tener que ‘have to’. The analysis is based on a corpus of political debates from the European Parliament, conducted 2010‒2011 by Spanish MEPs. In total, 578 occurrences of deber and 334 occurrences of tener que have been studied in detail, in order to understand their semantic and pragmatic behavior.

Out of the 912 cases, 860 were classified as deontic necessity and 52 as dynamic necessity. When separating the deontic readings from the dynamic ones, the notions of volitivity and factuality proved to be crucial: whereas deontic cases are volitive and non-factual, dynamic cases can be described as non-volitive and, to a high extent, factual.

In order to further examine the deontic uses, four classificatory variables were taken into account, namely, grammatical person, degree of agentivity, tense and source of the necessity. The distributions of deber and tener que were analyzed using Chi-square tests. Statistically significant differences were found for all four variables. The results show that deber is highly preferred in the third person, whereas tener que occurs equally often in the first and third person. Moreover, deber occurs more frequently in contexts which obscure the responsible agent, such as the impersonal se construction and inanimate subjects. As far as tense is concerned, the major difference between deber and tener que is found in the conditional tense, where tener que barely occurs, while deber is fairly frequent. A final difference between the two verbs is that the speaker usually is the source of the necessity when tener que is used, whereas deber is the first option when the speaker refers to another source or authority.

In conclusion, it is argued, firstly, that there is a clear difference between deontic and dynamic modality in Spanish, and secondly, that deber and tener que display different semantic and pragmatic functions in deontic contexts, pointing towards an intersubjective use of deber and a subjective use of tener que.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2017. , p. 221
Series
Studia Romanica Upsaliensia, ISSN 0562-3022 ; 85
Keyword [en]
deontic modality, dynamic modality, Spanish modal verbs, subjectivity, intersubjectivity, source of the necessity
Keyword [es]
modalidad deóntica, modalidad dinámica, verbos modales, subjetividad, intersubjetividad, fuente de la necesidad
National Category
Specific Languages General Language Studies and Linguistics
Research subject
Romance Languages
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-309551ISBN: 978-91-554-9788-0 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-309551DiVA, id: diva2:1062788
Public defence
2017-02-25, Ihresalen, Engelska parken, Thunbergsvägen 3L, Uppsala, 10:15 (Spanish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2017-02-03 Created: 2016-12-05 Last updated: 2018-01-13

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1362 kB)153 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1362 kBChecksum SHA-512
75827eb4d12a1c3e8cdaf6050d2e2fa05552ea0b18d7af6044e1029a49c2ba00675de84c3a710c50e767b301f69ff5e8a4da7547e95355d78461adf764e50455
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
Buy this publication >>

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Thegel, Miriam
By organisation
Department of Modern Languages
Specific LanguagesGeneral Language Studies and Linguistics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 153 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 1233 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf