Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
HFD om verklig innebörd första halvåret 2012: Vinstandelsräntemålet och kommuninvestmålet
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Law, Department of Law.
2012 (Swedish)In: Svensk skattetidning, ISSN 0346-2218, no 8, p. 679-689Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Norstedts Juridik AB, 2012. no 8, p. 679-689
National Category
Law
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-311110OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-311110DiVA, id: diva2:1058502
Available from: 2016-12-21 Created: 2016-12-21 Last updated: 2017-11-29Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Internprissättning och omkarakterisering: En studie av möjligheten att omkarakterisera gränsöverskridande transaktioner vid inkomstbeskattningen
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Internprissättning och omkarakterisering: En studie av möjligheten att omkarakterisera gränsöverskridande transaktioner vid inkomstbeskattningen
2016 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The purpose of the compilation thesis has been to compare the ability to recharacterize cross-border transactions under the OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines, 2010 version (OECD Guidelines), and OECDs new guidance from the BEPS project 2015 (Final Report) with the possibility to reclassify legal transactions in accordance with Swedish domestic law. The latter is an interpretation of the Swedish Supreme Administrative Court’s (SAC) case law on the taxation of transactions based of their true import. The aim has also been to examine if the possibility to recharacterize cross-border transactions under the OECD Guidelines and Final Report is limited by domestic law, i.e. SAC’s case law or the Correction Rule when the Correction Rule is to be applied. The Correction Rule is the Swedish domestic arm’s length principle rule. A central methodological question is the value of OECD’s guidance as a legal source when the correction rule and tax treaties are to be applied, considering e.g. the principle of legality and the Vienna treaty convention and the fact that Sweden is a dualistic State, meaning that implementation of tax treaties into Swedish law by the Swedish congress is required.

The conclusion is that the OECD’s guidance regarding recharacterization goes beyond the possibility provided for under domestic law. The OECD guidance regarding recharacterization adds something new other than what follows from the Correction Rule. To recharacterize transactions in accordance with OECDs non-binding guidelines, i.e. based on economic substance or that the transaction is irrational, goes according to the study beyond the scope of reasonable interpretations of the Correction Rule. This does not mean that transactions cannot be recharacterized under current Swedish law, but it means that the OECD guidance on recharacterization cannot be used. The legal option available to recharacterize transactions when the Correction Rule is tested is the corresponding review of taxation on the basis of transactions true import made under SAC’s case law. The practices and methodical review to be applied is that for Case law when civil law classification has been crucial in taxation and Economic concepts that do not find any determination in legal rules. Tax treaties cannot extend taxation by recharacterization in the situation that this cannot be done under Swedish domestic law or in the situation that there are no clear answers in domestic law.

The study also presents comments de lege ferenda regarding the appropriateness of allowing the OECD guidance on recharacterization to form the basis for new legislation in Sweden and the need to review the Correction Rule. It also asks the question if the new guidance is compatible with the arm’s length principle in Article 9 in the OECD Model Convention. Finally, the study also comments the need for OECD to analyze the effects for companies and authorities that transactions, although properly labelled with contract and civil law, they can be recharacterized due to OECDs far reaching new guidance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Uppsala: Iustus förlag, 2016. p. 393
Series
Skrifter från Juridiska fakulteten i Uppsala, ISSN 0282-2040 ; 132
Keyword
internprissättning, omkaraterisering
National Category
Law
Research subject
Fiscal Law
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-306717 (URN)978-91-7678-983-4 (ISBN)
Public defence
2017-01-24, Auditorium Minus, Museum Gustavianum, Akademigatan 3, Uppsala, 10:15 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2016-12-23 Created: 2016-11-02 Last updated: 2017-01-24

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1261 kB)39 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1261 kBChecksum SHA-512
7635cce2cd0c28e7ae3e06d296d4facc4677f9923e59f0f736d12921f261182a734ddc4764e0c7f766585c79a49cb1763d6515a4736929f93464cd0e11b94180
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Burmeister, Jari
By organisation
Department of Law
In the same journal
Svensk skattetidning
Law

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 39 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 330 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf