Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Performance determinants For Swedish Financial Monetary Institutions: Panel Data evidence between 2010-2014.
Dalarna University, School of Technology and Business Studies, Business Administration and Management.
2016 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Due to the rapid changes that governs the Swedish financial sector such as financial deregulations and technological innovations, it is imperative to examine the extent to which the Swedish Financial institutions had performed amid these changes. For this to be accomplish, the work investigates what are the determinants of performance for Swedish Financial Monetary Institutions? Assumptions were derived from theoretical and empirical literatures to investigate the authenticity of this research question using seven explanatory variables.

Two models were specified using Returns on Asset (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE) as the main performance indicators and for the sake of reliability and validity, three different estimators such as Ordinary Least Square (OLS), Generalized Least Square (GLS) and Feasible Generalized Least Square (FGLS) were employed. The Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) was also used to verify which specification explains performance better while performing robustness check of parameter estimates was done by correcting for standard errors.

Based on the findings, ROA specification proves to have the lowest Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Standard errors compared to ROE specification. Under ROA, two variables; the profit margins and the Interest coverage ratio proves to be statistically significant while under ROE just the interest coverage ratio (ICR) for all the estimators proves significant. The result also shows that the FGLS is the most efficient estimator, then follows the GLS and the last OLS. when corrected for SE robust, the gearing ratio which measures the capital structure becomes significant under ROA and its estimate become positive under ROE robust.

Conclusions were drawn that, within the period of study three variables (ICR, profit margins and gearing) shows significant and four variables were insignificant. The overall findings show that the institutions strive to their best to maximize returns but these returns were just normal to cover their costs of operation. Much should be done as per the ASC theory to avoid liquidity and credit risks problems. Again, estimated values of ICR and profit margins shows that a considerable amount of efforts with sound financial policies are required to increase performance by one percentage point. Areas of further research could be how the individual stochastic factors such as the Dupont model, repo rates, inflation, GDP etc. can influence performance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016.
Keyword [en]
Performance, Profitability, Returns on Assets/Equity, Interest coverage, Liquidity, regression analysis etc.
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-23506OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-23506DiVA: diva2:1050823
Available from: 2016-11-30 Created: 2016-11-30

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1251 kB)3 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1251 kBChecksum SHA-512
1c0a9c779b3a3531bdefd6b9de773b4d19989fac90903bf0ce0552237cff0ac671d4778346514a4b99a7c1bd78b35e4896796851d360774d4e97e4944247e968
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Business Administration and Management
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 3 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 13 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link