Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Automation and human expertise in operational river forecasting
Bur Meteorol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia..
European Ctr Medium Range Weather Forecast, Reading, Berks, England..
Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, Boulder, CO 80307 USA..
Inst Natl Rech Sci & Technol Environm & Agr IRSTE, Aix En Provence, France..
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-WATER, Vol. 3, no 5, 692-705 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Increased automation and use of computer-aided decision support systems are attractive options for hydrologic forecasting agencies faced with growing product complexity and institutional resourcing pressures. Although the hydrologic literature has been nearly silent on the roles of expertise and automation in forecasting, other disciplines such as meteorology have had decades of open discussion on the topic. To address the lack of dialogue in hydrology on automation, this article seeks to contextualize relevant findings from similar disciplines, including meteorology, psychology, decision support systems, and interface design. We predict which aspects of operational hydrology have the greatest chance for successfully increasing automation in the near future. Some applications have employed higher levels of automation, notably flash flood forecasting which requires rapid response times, and extended prediction which requires heavy emphasis on uncertainty quantification. Short-range flood forecasting may be more challenging to automate and traditionally has been less automated than other types of forecasts, partly because of existing practices of interfacing with meteorologists and water system operators, and the difficulties in modeling human impacts on the water cycle. Overall, we suggest that the design of computer-aided decision support systems for forecasting systems should consider three factors: (1) processes change under automation and people may require new roles; (2) automation changes the way people behave, sometimes negatively; and (3) people may not have accurate perceptions of the quality of the automated guidance. Seven lessons learned from automation in meteorology are highlighted and translated into a hydrologic forecasting context, leading to a set of recommendations for how to make best use of expertise in increasingly automated systems.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 3, no 5, 692-705 p.
National Category
Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences Oceanography, Hydrology, Water Resources
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-307871DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1163ISI: 000382875300005OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-307871DiVA: diva2:1048890
Available from: 2016-11-22 Created: 2016-11-22 Last updated: 2016-11-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(257 kB)23 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 257 kBChecksum SHA-512
581dc2be702b529daca844031cb375e5408c5b247a9b5f9b5873d17d124186dfd4392a2552380c01a740cb6334390ea286edf599fabe79800d835f35f63ebd0c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text
By organisation
LUVAL
Meteorology and Atmospheric SciencesOceanography, Hydrology, Water Resources

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 23 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 20 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link