Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Factors facilitating a national quality registry to aid clinical quality improvement: findings of a national survey
Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Caring Science/Nursing. Uppsala universitet.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7737-169X
Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Caring Science/Nursing. Karolinska institutet.
Uppsala universitet.
Uppsala universitet.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: BMJ Open, ISSN 2044-6055, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 6, no 11, e011562Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: While national quality registries (NQRs) are suggested to provide opportunities for systematic follow-up and learning opportunities, and thus clinical improvements, features in registries and contexts triggering such processes are not fully known. This study focuses on one of the world's largest stroke registries, the Swedish NQR Riksstroke, investigating what aspects of the registry and healthcare organisations facilitate or hinder the use of registry data in clinical quality improvement.

Methods: Following particular qualitative studies, we performed a quantitative survey in an exploratory sequential design. The survey, including 50 items on context, processes and the registry, was sent to managers, physicians and nurses engaged in Riksstroke in all 72 Swedish stroke units. Altogether, 242 individuals were presented with the survey; 163 responded, representing all but two units. Data were analysed descriptively and through multiple linear regression.

Results: A majority (88%) considered Riksstroke data to facilitate detection of stroke care improvement needs and acknowledged that their data motivated quality improvements (78%). The use of Riksstroke for quality improvement initiatives was associated (R2=0.76) with ‘Colleagues’ call for local results’ (p=<0.001), ‘Management Request of Registry data’ (p=<0.001), and it was said to be ‘Simple to explain the results to colleagues’ (p=0.02). Using stepwise regression, ‘Colleagues’ call for local results’ was identified as the most influential factor. Yet, while 73% reported that managers request registry data, only 39% reported that their colleagues call for the unit's Riksstroke results.

Conclusions: While an NQR like Riksstroke demonstrates improvement needs and motivates stakeholders to make progress, local stroke care staff and managers need to engage to keep the momentum going in terms of applying registry data when planning, performing and evaluating quality initiatives.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 6, no 11, e011562
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Research subject
Health and Welfare
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-23428DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011562OAI: diva2:1048234
Available from: 2016-11-21 Created: 2016-11-21 Last updated: 2016-12-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(869 kB)9 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 869 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eldh, Ann CatrineWallin, Lars
By organisation
Caring Science/Nursing
In the same journal
BMJ Open
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 9 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 51 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link