Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Ruotsinkielisten suomenoppijoiden strategioista paikallissijojen valinnassa
Umeå University, Faculty of Arts, Department of language studies.
2016 (Finnish)In: Lähivõrdlusi. Lähivertailuja, ISSN 1736-9290, no 26, 339-372 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [fi]

Tässä artikkelissa tarkastelen kuuden ruotsinkielisen suomenoppijan selityksiä strategioista, joita he käyttävät valitessaanpaikallissijaa kolmeen erityyppiseen tehtävään. Tehtävien virkkeisiin on valittu sellaisia paikallissijatapauksia, jotka aiemmin saamieni tulosten mukaan ovat ongelmallisia oppijoille. Menetelmänä on introspektiomenetelmiin kuuluva itsehavainnointi, ja tarkastelu on keskittynyt oppijoiden selityksiin ja etenkin heidän havaintoihinsa paikallissijan määräävistä tekijöistä eli toiminnan tilan laadusta, toiminnan liikkeen suunnasta ja rektioverbeistä. Tehtävien suoritusten analyysissa on käytetty virheanalyysia.

Tutkimuksesta käy ilmi, että oppijat ovat tottumattomia kuvaamaan strategioitaan, ja heidän selityksensä eivät sisällä kovinkaan monia syvempiä sijapohdintoja. Tuloksen mukaan oppijat tukeutuvat useissa tapauksissa äidinkielensä malleihin ja valitsevat paikallissijan ruotsin prepositioilmauksen pohjalta. Toiminnan tilan laadun ja liikkeen suunnan kommentoinnit korostuvat eri tavoin tehtävittäin. Virkkeiden verbeihin, varsinkin rektioverbeihin, kiinnitetään hyvin vähän huomiota, mikä kasvattaa kohdekielenvastaisten paikallissijasijavalintojen määrää.

Abstract [en]

This article presents the results of research on how Swedish-speaking students learning Finnish as a foreign language choose local cases and describe their strategies to do it. The research is based on the descriptions from six students who have studied Finnish for about 1.5–2 years at the university. The goal of this study is to get more detailed information about the methods and strategies students use when they are dealing with the local cases.

The material used in this study is collected with a test containing three types of exercises: in exercise 1 the students inflect one given word in some local case, in exercise 2 each meaning contains three words inflected in different local cases and the student chooses one alternative, and in exercise 3 the student translates ten Swedish meanings to Finnish and one word in every meaning is to be inflected in a local case. In every exercise the student also describes what kind of strategy he or she uses to find the right local case. In total, the material contains 154 answers.

The material is analyzed in two parts and with two methods. In the first part an introspective method, self-observation, is used, and in the second part error analysis. The focus in part one is on the students’ descriptions of their strategies for choosing a local case. In part two the students’ local case choices are analyzed.

The Finnish local case system is quite a complicated system because a learner must bear in mind several aspects simultaneously: the quality of the location (inside/outside) and the direction of the movement (to/at/from). The fact that there is a large number of verbs that govern a specific local case for their arguments also makes the choice of local case more diffcult.

The results show that the students have diffculties explaining in writing how they really think and decide when choosing the local cases. The descriptions are short and often contain only a Swedish preposition or preposition expression. Quite often the students also describe how a Finnish expression is expressed in Swedish and then they think in a Swedish way and choose a wrong local case. This has happened in 35 % of the occurrences of local cases in this material. The answers contain comments on the location and direction of movement. In exercises1 and 2 the students comment more on the direction of movement than the location and their choice of case is based on a Swedish preposition expression. In exercise 3, on the other hand, the quality of location is commented on more frequently. A common feature for almost all answers is that the students pay very little attention to verbs and especially to the governing verbs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Tallinn, 2016. no 26, 339-372 p.
Keyword [en]
local case, introspection, self-observation, error analysis, learner Finnish, Finnish as a foreign language, Finnish, Swedish
Keyword [fi]
paikallissija, introspektio, itsehavainnointi, virheanalyysi, oppijansuomi, suomi vieraana kielenä, suomi, ruotsi
National Category
Specific Languages
Research subject
Finno-Ugric Languages
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-127763DOI: 10.5128/LV26.11OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-127763DiVA: diva2:1047954
Available from: 2016-11-19 Created: 2016-11-19 Last updated: 2016-11-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(380 kB)12 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 380 kBChecksum SHA-512
91f0ea725a08712fd39e159ac1808693b9baad78edcec517f97c6f9405d75a60c8010582d06186870d2c0715d48b1cb45966e3ab97df85bb55ea52596aae69a5
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textURL

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Määttä, Tuija
By organisation
Department of language studies
Specific Languages

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 12 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 100 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link