Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Language Meddles with Infants' Processing of Observed Actions
Ist Italiano Tecnol, Robot Brain & Cognit Sci Dept, Cognit Interact Lab, Genoa, Italy..
Heriot Watt Univ, Math & Comp Sci, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland.;Univ Bielefeld, Appl Informat Grp, Bielefeld, Germany..
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology.
Show others and affiliations
2016 (English)In: Frontiers in Robotics and AI, ISSN 2296-9144, Vol. 3, 46Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

When learning from actions, language can be a crucial source to specify the learning content. Understanding its interactions with action processing is therefore fundamental when attempting to model the development of human learning to replicate it in artificial agents. From early childhood, two different processes participate in shaping infants' understanding of the events occurring around them: Infants' motor system influences their action perception, driving their attention to the action goal; additionally, parental language influences the way children parse what they observe into relevant units. To date, however, it has barely been investigated whether these two cognitive processes- action understanding and language- are separate and independent or whether language might interfere with the former. To address this question, we evaluated whether a verbal narrative concurrent with action observation could avert 14-month-old infants' attention from an agent's action goal, which is otherwise naturally selected when the action is performed by an agent. The infants observed movies of an actor reaching and transporting balls into a box. In three between-subject conditions, the reaching movement was accompanied either with no audio (Base condition), a sine-wave sound (Sound condition), or a speech sample (Speech condition). The results show that the presence of a speech sample underlining the movement phase reduced significantly the number of predictive gaze shifts to the goal compared to the other conditions. Our findings thus indicate that any modeling of the interaction between language and action processing will have to consider a potential top-down effect of the former, as language can be a meddler in the predictive behavior typical of the observation of goal-oriented actions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. Vol. 3, 46
Keyword [en]
prediction, eye movement, development, action understanding, acoustic packaging, speech
National Category
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-305940DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2016.00046ISI: 000384347100001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-305940DiVA: diva2:1045808
Funder
EU, FP7, Seventh Framework Programme
Available from: 2016-11-10 Created: 2016-10-24 Last updated: 2016-11-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(542 kB)26 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 542 kBChecksum SHA-512
e0b28fc8e838a51c7a987fb51813341c60d1b235c1e2abccba5cc40067b1e6d9b5fdc91782faed91488f46d770319c967a13eb6cb41bd3f5d28d2f6668503277
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gredebäck, GustafKoch, Benjamin
By organisation
Department of Psychology
Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 26 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 11 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link