Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Defining a method for identifying architectural candidates as part of engineering a system architecture
RISE, Swedish ICT, SICS, Software and Systems Engineering Laboratory.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8891-033X
RISE, Swedish ICT, SICS.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0921-0878
2014 (English)Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Engineering system architectures for complex systems involves the tasks of analyzing architectural drivers, identifying architectural concerns, identifying valid architecture candidates, and evaluation of alternatives. One problem to overcome when architecting a system is the identification of valid of architectural candidates. We have developed a step-wise method for performing system architecture analysis and tested it on a sub-system in a project developing a drive system for heavy automotive applications. In this paper we present the complete method of nine steps for engineering an architecture and we elaborate in detail on the procedure to identify architectural candidates based on previously identified architectural drivers. We present a diagram depicting the proposed information model, its concepts and their relationships. In addition, the expectations on such a method as expressed by practitioners have been elicited, and we elaborate on the validity by examining how well the method indicate fulfillment. Our conclusion is that the proposed method does not fail to deliver on any of the needs and this gives an indication of usefulness. When identifying architectural candidates it is important to use proper criteria in the process. Our conclusion is that the practitioners should focus on candidates that affect the system at hand (within system boundaries), and on the candidates that address the architecturally significant system use. This is reflected in our method where we prescribe evaluation of the design candidates by validating that they solve only the right problem and by ensuring that they address the system at hand.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014, 14.
National Category
Computer and Information Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-24390OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ri-24390DiVA, id: diva2:1043471
Conference
Systems Conference (SysCon), 2014 8th Annual IEEE
Available from: 2016-10-31 Created: 2016-10-31 Last updated: 2018-01-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(276 kB)8 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 276 kBChecksum SHA-512
0326633e86e96d2242f8ea8d5b88ce5778f7f959fddc88f59323e275aa1b13cc1eb46a91dfbc8b44cb5d1b7087a281389ead2be9bfb0b2f469f956e1f26ec7a8
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fröberg, JoakimLarsson, Stig
By organisation
Software and Systems Engineering LaboratorySICS
Computer and Information Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 8 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 20 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf