Jämförelse mellan vägmodellering i Novapoint 18:30 och Civil 3D 2015
Independent thesis Basic level (university diploma), 5 credits / 7,5 HE creditsStudent thesis
This report contains a comparison between the industry’s two biggest road design programs in Sweden. The two compared programs are Vianova’s Novapoint 18.30 and Autodesk’s AutoCad Civil 3D 2015. The comparison is based on the programs different functions and tools, together with a small explanation in how to road design with each of the programs. Both programs proved to be similar in many ways, but some of the functions and the structure of the programs themselves make them quite different. I found that Civil 3D is a great choice due to the function Design Criteria, which allows you to create roads with design standards in the early stages of the road designing process. I also made the conclusion that Novapoint is a great program for learning the basics in road designing, due to being more user friendly and easier to learn for inexperienced people. In the end of the report you can also find a discussion part, where I present pros and cons of each of the programs.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. , 28 p.
Teknik, vägprojektering, vägmodellering, projekteringsprogram
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-55859Local ID: cabd9496-ebd0-4f24-9025-6edd305a045cOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-55859DiVA: diva2:1029243
Subject / course
Student thesis, at least 7,5 credits
Built Environment, Higher Education Diploma
Validerat; 20150603 (global_studentproject_submitter)2016-10-042016-10-04Bibliographically approved