Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Reliabilitetstest av en kortversion av Coping Strategies Questionnaire
2012 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (professional degree), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Persistent pain is a common condition. Pain affects humans in an unfriendly way since it becomes never-ending. The influences are universal and include physically, mentally, emotionally and socially affects. Different coping strategies are common to use to handle pain. There are different kinds of coping strategies, some affects in a positive way and others in a negative way. The choice of strategy is often made unconsciously. The self rating instrument Coping Strategies Questionnarie (CSQ) rates coping strategies in the use of handle pain. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of a short version of Coping Strategies Questionnarie. 18 participants were approached to contribute to this study by a registered physiotherapist at a rehabilitating center, focused on pain, in Norrbotten. All of them were included in the analysis of internal consistency of subscales and 13 represented test-retest. Statistic analysis consisted Chronbach’s alpha for internal consistency of subscales and t-test for reliability of test-retest. This questionnaire study was anonymous. The short version of CSQ and the internal consistency were not reliable enough in all parts of the self rating instrument. The participants used Coping self-statements and Catastrophizing most frequently to handle pain. The short version of CSQ needs further research and should be tested on additional people with persistent pain. Some parts of the instrument need more process to suit the target group in Sweden better. Handle of pain is highly individual.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. , 35 p.
Keyword [en]
Medicine
Keyword [sv]
Medicin, Copingstrategier, Coping Strategies Questionnarie, långvarig smärta, reliabilitetstest, sjukgymnastik
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-55090Local ID: bfdb72de-3b52-466b-bf4b-a27f329f390dOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-55090DiVA: diva2:1028471
Subject / course
Student thesis, at least 15 credits
Educational program
Physiotherapy, bachelor's level
Supervisors
Examiners
Note
Validerat; 20120111 (anonymous)Available from: 2016-10-04 Created: 2016-10-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(535 kB)54 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 535 kBChecksum SHA-512
91bfb4a1ba6c8bf23f858f6b41a9b00a567145967209db8d03434538ec1b741054f02b513c93a9d0210eed1443c62cf19bcac365cbfeee8806eb615d7c94922c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hedström, JennyOhlsson, Josefin

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 54 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 331 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf