Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Ökad diagnostisk säkerhet av polyper i kolon med CT-kolografi
2011 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (professional degree), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

This report deals with the diagnosis of pathological changes in the colon, specifically polyps and colorectal cancers. In the diagnosis of polyps, three main methods are widely used: Colon X-ray, colonoscopy and CT colonography. In this report, all three methods are considered. This report also deals with the pathology of the colon, colon x-ray, colonoscopy, CT technology and CT malignancy evaluation. Many hospitals are increasingly utilizing CT colonography as a radiology methodical first choice in the evaluation of suspect polyps and malignancies from methods previously used (mainly colon imaging with double contrast). The advantages of CT colonography are above all: higher diagnostic confidence, higher sensitivity and especially a more "comfortable" examination for the patient. CT colonography provides the radiologist with an array of information about the patient's colon. The images can be shown in 3D and also provide valuable information about surrounding areas, being of great benefit in the event of an incidental finding. However, CT colonography also has its limitations and drawbacks. A CT machine is expensive to purchase and service, the survey is done by ionizing radiation and leads to relatively high radiation dose to the patient and review of the images takes time and requires increased radiology resources. In this report, it has been investigated whether CT colonography has the diagnostic ability to detect clinically relevant polyps. The results show that CT colonography is an excellent method in ensuring the diagnosis of polyps 10 mm or larger, but the method in itself should not be regarded as a replacement of colonoscopy, rather as an excellent complement. Several articles were examined to compare CT colonography's ability to detect polyps compared to colonoscopy. One article compared the five different screening methods regarding the survey methods ability to detect polyps and cancer. It was found that the diagnostic confidence achieved with CT colonography is comparable to the diagnostic confidence achieved with colonoscopy, which is often considered the most reliable of all existing methods.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2011. , 42 p.
Keyword [en]
Medicine
Keyword [sv]
Medicin, Polyper, Kolorektal cancer, Datortomografi, Konventionell röntgen, Koloskopi
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-51088Local ID: 84da9f06-1e44-4c29-bea1-68b42b6ca22cOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-51088DiVA: diva2:1024451
Subject / course
Student thesis, at least 15 credits
Educational program
Diagnostic Radiology Nursing, bachelor's level
Supervisors
Examiners
Note
Validerat; 20110120 (anonymous)Available from: 2016-10-04 Created: 2016-10-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(548 kB)232 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 548 kBChecksum SHA-512
339b29f31b934c95e65595f0c054f874fa9c7714e27787b9b091fddc2e4e7034f3b17adf83120cac47045144b649474f051a665984e34d521da4c9dcbba42ee2
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Langsjö, Johanna

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 232 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 31 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf