Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Risk- och Mervärdesanalys som verktyg vid jämförelser av dagvattensystem: Fallstudie av handelsområdet Solbacken
2015 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (professional degree), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

In order to classify stormwater as a resource, rather than a problem, tools to emphasize added values generated by the stormwater system, are needed. In this study, the aim was to develop a method based on added values and risks for comparison and evaluation of stormwater systems.How added values are classified differs from case to case. The approach and the purpose of the analysis also affects the evaluation of added values. In this report added values are defined as:A value, for an individual, an organisation or the environment, other than the object's main intended purpose.In this report five different categories of risks and added values were studied, namely: environment, economy, technology, health and socioculture. In the analysis of added values the data collection was made in a questionnaire. A group was appointed the task to compile the answers and evaluate the outcome and identify the added values generated by the stormwater system. The risk assessment was conducted by estimating probabilities and consequences of a range of identified risk sources. The results were presented in a matrix.The methodology was tested in a case study where two stormwater systems were evaluated and compared to each other. One of the systems was a swale system and the other was a piped storm drainage system. The result showed no major differences with respect to added values, on the contrary, the risk assessment indicated some significant differences. The case study confirms that the developed and evaluated tool is applicable for this type of evaluation and comparison between different stormwater systems in diverse surroundings.The method, developed in this study can with advantage be used as a complementing tool when evaluating different stormwater system options.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. , p. 91
Keywords [en]
Technology
Keywords [sv]
Teknik
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-49761Local ID: 71297ca7-acfc-45dc-b586-d31a0d92de71OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-49761DiVA, id: diva2:1023108
External cooperation
Subject / course
Student thesis, at least 30 credits
Educational program
Civil Engineering, master's level
Supervisors
Examiners
Note
Validerat; 20150609 (global_studentproject_submitter)Available from: 2016-10-04 Created: 2016-10-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3070 kB)160 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 3070 kBChecksum SHA-512
f9a5f4f98c993600d43b1aa466205a99b4e91c578f4a98a47f24252533dc9554c7797e9c6a70818a1ef1503ef72a0b73a1e3e5e3d569ec57f7c1c2b8ca2b69d8
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 160 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 212 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf